Help me actually understand why Active Display is awesome!

Discussion in 'Alternatives to iOS and iOS Devices' started by TechGod, Oct 20, 2014.

  1. TechGod macrumors 68040

    TechGod

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #1
    AFAIK, iOS has had those lock screen notifications since iOS 5, why is it being touted as a major feature on the Moto X but whereas no one seems to mention iOS has had this before?

    I mean iOS allows you to swipe the notification on the lock screen to reply to it which seems similar enough to Active Display.

    Is it because it uses AMOLED to only light up what it needs? Is that the only reason why it is regarded as an awesome feature.
     
  2. Lloydbm41 macrumors 68040

    Lloydbm41

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Location:
    Central California
    #2
    Active Display pulses on and off, giving minimal information until you tap and hold to get your info. You can then let go and it will go back to pulsing or open up that specific notification. This is in addition to getting your notifications by simply verbally asking for them, regardless if the phone is plugged in or not.

    The iPhone just sits there with a black screen until you physically turn it on. It is a far cry from what the Moto X (and most Lumia phones) can do.
     
  3. TechGod thread starter macrumors 68040

    TechGod

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #3
    The iPhone turns it's screen on by it's self when it gets a notification. Then it shows all your apps that have sent you notification and you can swipe to open that notification.

    On iOS it also shows you info when the screen automatically turns on. I guess it doesn't blink but us that essential?
    The third thing however is interesting.
     
  4. LIVEFRMNYC macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    #4
    That is not active display. That is simply just the screen turning on at every notification. Active Display should be THIS.
     
  5. TechGod thread starter macrumors 68040

    TechGod

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #5
    I just guess I don't see the difference. The fact that it turns on when you take it out of your pocket is pretty cool but IMO, that's all I see that is different to the iOS implementation.
     
  6. beavo451 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    #6
    What do you think of a notification LED? If you don't "get" notification LEDs, then you probably won't "get" Active Display.
     
  7. TechGod thread starter macrumors 68040

    TechGod

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #7
    I understand why the LED makes sense.
     
  8. ecrispy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    #8
    Active Display means if you get an imp mail at 10pm which you missed, when you glance at your phone 30min later, it will still pulse periodically and will let you know.

    iPhone won't do that, an Android phone without AD won't do it, but most Androids have notification led for this purpose.

    It was one of the most innovative features of the Moto X.
     
  9. Technarchy macrumors 604

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #9
    Sounds like a hit to battery life not directly related to real usage.
     
  10. ecrispy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2013
    #10
    No its not. You should read Moto X reviews if you really are serious about understanding this feature.
     
  11. Savor Suspended

    Savor

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    #11
    It can since it keeps the sensors on which can kill standby time.

    I use alternatives like DynamicNotifcations which isn't as good as Active Display but my only purpose is for the screen to turn on once I receive a message since I hate pressing the power button to wake up the screen. I use it along with SMS Wakeup. AcDisplay is also a good one but doesn't work on 4.1.2.
     
  12. TechGod thread starter macrumors 68040

    TechGod

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #12
    I don't think so with AMOLED.

    ----------

    I see, so with iOS it lights up then if you miss it, then it will stay off, whereas with the Moto X it will be there regardless of time?

    So the functionality is the same as the iOS counterpart except it doesn't eat as much battery and stays there for how long you need it? So it is better in those regards.
     
  13. Heavy Fluid macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    #13
    As an X owner, there is a minimal hit to the battery life. Active Display is something that you get used to rather quickly. It is a really nice function to have on a phone.
     
  14. Lloydbm41 macrumors 68040

    Lloydbm41

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Location:
    Central California
    #14
    I have both phones. Active Display is better in form, function and execution.
    1. Display pulses to give you the time and all notification via their logo.
    2. Tap the logo and hold and the information plus images appears at the top of the screen. Drag the icon up and it opens the app. Drag the icon left or right to delete. Let go and the notification remains. Repeat for additional notification.
    3. Put phone in pocket or face down and screen does not activate at all. Flip the phone over or pull out of your pocket and the display comes on to show time and any notifications.
    4. There is a very minor battery hit using this feature all day long. It is estimated to use roughly 6-7% battery over a single charge.

    You get none of this with Apples lock screen notifications.
     
  15. Fernandez21 macrumors 601

    Fernandez21

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    #15
    The last time I had the moto x I actually disabled it because I didn't like it as much as NiLS, which is very similar to my iPhone. While the pulsing is cool, you don't really know what notification you have other than it was a text or an email. You also can't take action on those notifications without opening up the app

    With NiLS and now iOS8 I can see the list of emails and text messages I have, and right from the lockscreen I can see enough information from each email to know what they're about and mark them as read or delete as well as reply to texts on iOS. I find this much more useful than having to hold an Icon to get the info on a single email or text and then unlocking to the app to take action.

    I do miss the way the screen activated when you pick up the device though.
     
  16. JaySoul macrumors 68020

    JaySoul

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    #16
    NiLS started getting quite hit and miss for me, so I started using Heads Up - which is different, but I like it a lot more. Can't do without it now.
     
  17. fredaroony macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    #17
    I like it because there are many times when you're not looking at your phone to see the notification and I don't need to turn it on to check. I almost always have my phone on silent too.
     

Share This Page