Hi all,
I've just been notified "from above" that I have clearance to go ahead with buying a new MBP 2018. The funding is good, though I have to make a decision in regards to CPU and SSD. The two options are:
- i5, 16 GB-ram, 1 TB HD.
- i7, 16 GB-ram, 512 GB HD.
What would you recommend? I am working with a horizon of 5-7 years of usage. Though I am not editing videos, I would consider my needs to be in the above average:
- Lightroom editing of RAW-photos.
- Fusion with Windows.
- Normally 6-8 "regular" programs open (Safari, mail, office, calendar and the like).
If I go with the 512 GB HD, I will be fine for now, but dependent on a storage drive. That is OK, I currently use Google's new "file steam"-solution with storage in the sky and no image on the drive.
I guess my question is, how much I will gain from the i7 in real life. I've read some comments on the i7 claiming that the gain is minimal due to throttling.
Is the i5 the real sweat spot on this thin MBP-monster?
Morten
I've just been notified "from above" that I have clearance to go ahead with buying a new MBP 2018. The funding is good, though I have to make a decision in regards to CPU and SSD. The two options are:
- i5, 16 GB-ram, 1 TB HD.
- i7, 16 GB-ram, 512 GB HD.
What would you recommend? I am working with a horizon of 5-7 years of usage. Though I am not editing videos, I would consider my needs to be in the above average:
- Lightroom editing of RAW-photos.
- Fusion with Windows.
- Normally 6-8 "regular" programs open (Safari, mail, office, calendar and the like).
If I go with the 512 GB HD, I will be fine for now, but dependent on a storage drive. That is OK, I currently use Google's new "file steam"-solution with storage in the sky and no image on the drive.
I guess my question is, how much I will gain from the i7 in real life. I've read some comments on the i7 claiming that the gain is minimal due to throttling.
Is the i5 the real sweat spot on this thin MBP-monster?
Morten