this thread topic is a bit senseless. it's obviously high demand.
how did the OP come up with "low supply"
oh wait, don't tell me, did OP and the rest (who agrees to "low supply") get low supply as an
end result?
when something cause/result the "supply" to be "low" due to a "high" demand but still met eventually, the
INITIAL SUPPLY was never LOW to begin with.
this is complete stupidity.
case-in-point. (example)
in 2010, the supply is 5million.
in 2011, the supply is 8million.
in 2014, the supply is 20million.
"oh yea, this year, there's not enough iphone because of low supply"
Image
--
the supply is obviously high, but the demand is much higher.