I've never seen another device that require so many functions go through a single button. Spare us your sarcastic nonsense, that some many people have posted that their home button has broken is proof enough of a bad design.
Not sarcasm, irony. There actually is a difference.
And I wasn't saying the design was good or bad, so telling me "plenty" of people with broken home buttons is a largely irrelevant response. The idea that Apple designed it such that it would break more quickly is pretty ludicrous. There are plenty of 4+ year old devices still in use today.
And for the record, a mouse gets WAY more clicks in its lifetime than than does this home button. On that topic, so does the trackpad on newer Apple laptops (along with the Magic track pad). Are these products then designed to break sooner so that they are quickly replaced? Of course not. Implying that would be equally ludicrous.
Last edited: