The only thing that wouldn't be the same is custom content like an individual playlist that your wife set up within her account.
Exactly my point. If my wife and kids can't play their personal playlists the HomePod isn't much use to us.
The only thing that wouldn't be the same is custom content like an individual playlist that your wife set up within her account.
I think you're a niche case. HomePod would make a great stereo sound bar for AppleTV and controlling TV with only voice is cool but it's not a dealbreaker for most. Music playing is the most used feature on all smart speakers so there's no reason to believe HomePod will be any different in that respect. I think that Homekit operation is much more of a dealbreaker for HomePod which is why this product is going to have a slow build of users similar to the Apple Watch. Apple does not what the top #2 and #3 uses of HomePod will be yet. They will know much more by the end of this year.The only thing that will truly differentiate the HomePod from the slew of AI assisted speakers out there is the ability to control the AppleTV with your voice.
Sonos is a much better product in the big scheme of things. It's personally scalable without breaking the bank (Play:1 is $150), it will be platform agnostic - works with Alexa now with Google Assistant and Airplay 2 in the works.
That's the only true strategic advantage that Apple has in the space. You can control almost every other Smart Home device with either Alexa or Google Assistant.
The Apple TV is a very good, albeit expensive media streamer. I have a Google Chromecast Ultra and a Fire TV. I can control the Chromecast via Google Assistant and the Fire TV with Alexa via Sonos One.
I like Apple TV the best because I have an LG Dolby Vision TV.
The capabilities with the AppleTV remote are good, but who wants to hold a remote in their hand to issue verbal commands anymore.
I would only consider the HomePod if and only if it can control the AppleTV.
I know that sounds lazy, but fortunately or unfortunately that's where we find ourselves today.
This +10000000000. Apple Music is suppoed to get smarter right? have the same exact issue with only 1 user accountSo if I’m understanding correctly this cannot be used with multiple Apple IDs in regards to calendars, reminders, timers, messages, Apple Music Accounts... this is disappointing. I don’t want my kids Paw Patrol or My Little Pony music showing up on my play history, and when my wife sets a reminder I don’t want to see it on my phone. I hope I am wrong. Having essentially a single user for those major hands free tasks is useless as a family speaker.
Apple has ALWAYS assumed that a user is tied to a device. They wanted everybody to have their own phones, tablets, laptops, etc. They never implemented multiple user support on iOS because Apple wanted people to buy their own devices, and I think this is going to kick them by introducing a product that will be shared between members of the same family or household. This is the first iOS device that will not be owned by an individual user, but by the household.
I think the delay has nothing to do with the hardware, I mean even Apple can't screw up a speaker that bad, but I think the delay was due to Apple trying to shoehorn this product into their existing service limitations, and I think this will be the HomePod's Achilles heal. I just don't think it will do a lot of little things that people already can do with Google or Amazon devices, like actually recognize different users until there are a lot of infrastructure changes to Siri and Apple Music. Sure anybody can come in and ask it the weather, EVERY other device lets you do that, but I don't think Apple has actually implemented the ability to ever know the difference between those users and give it personalized responses.
Yeah, I'm getting the same impression you are. If anything, this headline should read HomePod DOESN'T support multiple users.So, it can do what everyone else does, almost.
Not sure it sounds like Apple will do what Google does, and maybe Echo, but while anybody can ask those products anything Google lets you pair user accounts to the Home so that when Home detects your specific voice it will do customize and personalized responses. So if you have multiple users paired to the Home, it will say Hey User X, your commute to work will be 30 minutes or Hey User Y, your commute will take 23 minutes. What this also means if that multiple users have Google Music accounts, they will be able to access their specific playlists.
It sounds to me like the HomePod is tied to one Apple Music account, meaning that while it might provide personalized responses for the owner of that account, it does not really support "multiple users".
Apple has ALWAYS assumed that a user is tied to a device. They wanted everybody to have their own phones, tablets, laptops, etc. They never implemented multiple user support on iOS because Apple wanted people to buy their own devices, and I think this is going to kick them by introducing a product that will be shared between members of the same family or household. This is the first iOS device that will not be owned by an individual user, but by the household.
I think the delay has nothing to do with the hardware, I mean even Apple can't screw up a speaker that bad, but I think the delay was due to Apple trying to shoehorn this product into their existing service limitations, and I think this will be the HomePod's Achilles heal. I just don't think it will do a lot of little things that people already can do with Google or Amazon devices, like actually recognize different users until there are a lot of infrastructure changes to Siri and Apple Music. Sure anybody can come in and ask it the weather, EVERY other device lets you do that, but I don't think Apple has actually implemented the ability to ever know the difference between those users and give it personalized responses.
It would be an issue. Say my wife likes hip hop and I can’t stand it. Well if she plays hip hop music on the HomePod all day under my account soon Apple Music will think that I like it and start to curate my music based on false information.Since the songs/albums/artists available through Apple Music are the same for every user account, that wouldn't be an issue. The only thing that wouldn't be the same is custom content like an individual playlist that your wife set up within her account.
Works great until you already have a family of 6 people and are using all your slots. I really don’t how Apple can’t see that a single user Apple Music account is a HORRIBLE IDEA. If I set my phone and my wife’s phone side by side and said “hey Siri” only mine activates... how can this not be implemented on the HomePod!?I guess an option would be to create another Apple ID for the HomePod as we are only using 4 spots on our Family Apple Music plan. At least that way their music won't mess up my likes/dislikes. Doesn't solve the lists/txt/calendar issue but at this point nothing will.
Agreed single user is a HORRIBLE implementation.Works great until you already have a family of 6 people and are using all your slots. I really don’t how Apple can’t see that a single user Apple Music account is a HORRIBLE IDEA. If I set my phone and my wife’s phone side by side and said “hey Siri” only mine activates... how can this not be implemented on the HomePod!?
The only thing that will truly differentiate the HomePod from the slew of AI assisted speakers out there is the ability to control the AppleTV with your voice.
Sonos is a much better product in the big scheme of things. It's personally scalable without breaking the bank (Play:1 is $150), it will be platform agnostic - works with Alexa now with Google Assistant and Airplay 2 in the works.
That's the only true strategic advantage that Apple has in the space. You can control almost every other Smart Home device with either Alexa or Google Assistant.
The Apple TV is a very good, albeit expensive media streamer. I have a Google Chromecast Ultra and a Fire TV. I can control the Chromecast via Google Assistant and the Fire TV with Alexa via Sonos One.
I like Apple TV the best because I have an LG Dolby Vision TV.
The capabilities with the AppleTV remote are good, but who wants to hold a remote in their hand to issue verbal commands anymore.
I would only consider the HomePod if and only if it can control the AppleTV.
I know that sounds lazy, but fortunately or unfortunately that's where we find ourselves today.
Hope so at launch. They aren't always the most informed. I'm certain that it will eventually support this but afraid it might not at launch.HomePod can be used as a sound bar with Apple TV - confirmed!
Couldn't agree more. The fact that Siri can't control play/pause, power on/off of the Apple TV is absurd. The integration already exists for HomeKit.The only thing that will truly differentiate the HomePod from the slew of AI assisted speakers out there is the ability to control the AppleTV with your voice.
Sonos is a much better product in the big scheme of things. It's personally scalable without breaking the bank (Play:1 is $150), it will be platform agnostic - works with Alexa now with Google Assistant and Airplay 2 in the works.
That's the only true strategic advantage that Apple has in the space. You can control almost every other Smart Home device with either Alexa or Google Assistant.
The Apple TV is a very good, albeit expensive media streamer. I have a Google Chromecast Ultra and a Fire TV. I can control the Chromecast via Google Assistant and the Fire TV with Alexa via Sonos One.
I like Apple TV the best because I have an LG Dolby Vision TV.
The capabilities with the AppleTV remote are good, but who wants to hold a remote in their hand to issue verbal commands anymore.
I would only consider the HomePod if and only if it can control the AppleTV.
I know that sounds lazy, but fortunately or unfortunately that's where we find ourselves today.