You can make fun of it all you want but it is a basic feature Sonos has had forever and there are some people who like music in their bathrooms...Listen, all I want is to take my HomePod in the bathtub with me.
You can make fun of it all you want but it is a basic feature Sonos has had forever and there are some people who like music in their bathrooms...Listen, all I want is to take my HomePod in the bathtub with me.
This is becoming such a tired response. I've seen *many* audiophiles respond that the HomePod is indeed good enough for them. Just because there are better speakers, and better listening environments, doesn't mean that an audiophile, or anyone who appreciates music for that matter, can't get plenty of value from the HomePod.I have Martin Logan Electrostatic floor speakers for right and left and Martin Logan Electrostatic Center Channel speaker for home theater...all speakers require AC power to charge the panels......once you hear this kind of speaker...then any little speaker would sound very small. For some people this Apple speaker is good enough...not for audiophiles.
I said first and foremost. I do agree with you that the iPad should have multiple user integration not only for schools though. It is in a grey area while the HomePod clearly isn’t.So an iPad is a single user device? Do you have a family because I don't think you do.
So an iPad is a single user device? Do you have a family because I don't think you do.
Over Bluetooth or Airplay.
You can still stream to the HomePOd from a bluetooth or Airplay (2) other content. You however cannot use it's built in SIRI integration to control and play from these sources (yet).
It should work just fine. Apple TV allows you to send all system audio out via Airplay to other Apple TVs. HomePod should function as an Airplay speaker, so it should work just fine. I'll let you know once mine ships![]()
Agree. But I am sure they sounds great for their size and convenience. Setting up my Logan's are a pain and it can take months to get them perfectly positioned. Then you have a fairly small sweet spot where the sound is simply incredible. Outside of that spot, the sound is simply very good.
But inside that sweet spot, you can close your eyes (and with good recordings) place every person in the soundstage; hear every nuance; be truly immersed; believe you are listening to a live studio performance.
unfortunately it will take a long time, as I live in a country not considered much as an important market.I'm curious to hear your opinions and see that list of reviewers when you're done![]()
" If you close your eyes, it's easy to feel like you're at a live performance."
Stop. Just stop it now.
The whole thing seems odd. They list all the iOS devices as being "compatible" but no mention of Macs. Not being able to stream music from my MacBook seems weird.
I think the point though is that it cannot be played using SIRI's built in integration
YOu cannot tell the homepod via SIRI to play non iTunes purchased content (yet). You will be able to still stream to the HomePod any content you want via Airplay. how much of an impact that difference causes you as the user is up to you as the user.
But it's disingenuous to say that it's fully integrated with your entire iTunes music collection if it has such a limitation. FOr many of us, we have hundreds of CD's imported into iTunes. Do I really want to come up to my computer in a different room everytime I want to control it?
The whole thing seems odd. They list all the iOS devices as being "compatible" but no mention of Macs. Not being able to stream music from my MacBook seems weird.
Edited: If I have a playlist with my ripped CD content, I should be able to tell Siri to play that playlist. Not ideal, but should work.
Are you saying Martin Logans sound better than live?"equating HomePod's sound quality to a live performance."
Put this guy in front of some Martin Logans and his head will probably explode. lol, such hyperbole.
Most people have completely different experiences with 'live' based on the type of music played and the venues. To me, live music is terrible because I mostly go to clubs and large concerts playing mostly electric rock. They all sound like garbage but people go for the drinks, band performance and live atmosphere. Sound fidelity always comes last." If you close your eyes, it's easy to feel like you're at a live performance."
Stop. Just stop it now.
Apple never considered iPad a family device (see software limit and no Multi-Account choice) but my family didn't know this and both old and current iPads areleft around the house for anyone who may be in needSo an iPad is a single user device? Do you have a family because I don't think you do.
Im a Klipsch guy. Total opposite end of the speaker spectrum. This wont compare to a true stereo setup. I may pick one up for the bedroom though. Time will tellI have Martin Logan Electrostatic floor speakers for right and left and Martin Logan Electrostatic Center Channel speaker for home theater...all speakers require AC power to charge the panels......once you hear this kind of speaker...then any little speaker would sound very small. For some people this Apple speaker is good enough...not for audiophiles.
Don't worry. It won't put out that much bass.I really hope my downstairs neighbours don't hate me come 9 February.
In fact the first question raised is "What did they used for listening to music until now?"As others have noted, comparing the sound quality from a single (mono) teeny little speaker to live music just makes the reviewer look silly. In fact, whereas the quality of recorded music improved for 100 years with time over the 20th C ... for the last 17 years --- pretty much since the iPod came out --- we have seen the rise of low quality mp3, crappy headphones, backward regression from stereo to mono, lossy compression, and worst of all ... low bit-rate STREAMING ... sound quality has been going backwards. the average person's parents audio would almost unquestionably provide higher resolution than that which which most teens listen to today. It's ease of access over quality, its retrograde technology, and to people who care about quality and sonics, its very disappointing. Yes - this new Apple speaker is way better than listening over your earphones - but it is designed to be mono - MONO - like what your great grandparents had - and will be used by people to play low quality streams that typically discard (throw out) out about 80% to 90% of the original recorded information, when compared to a hi-res (e.g. SACD) recording.
And by the way "rocking the house" is not a HiFi quality. And while on this subject, Apple NEVER used the word "HiFi" in their official communications/keynote. Because, simply, they know the the HomePod is not a HiFi speaker. it's probably a very good "colored" speaker with an emphasis on base; so yes it may rock the house but it certainly will not rock audiophiles. I bet that a $350 Paradigm bookshelf speaker is way better and even the $ 250 Paradigm Shift A2 is probably more of a HiFi speaker.