I would not put it there, the woofer shoots straight up and you’ll severely limit the soundstage it puts out.Not sure to keep my HomePod here or not
Does this look a weird place to put it?
![]()
I would not put it there, the woofer shoots straight up and you’ll severely limit the soundstage it puts out.Not sure to keep my HomePod here or not
Does this look a weird place to put it?
![]()
Do you have listener preference data on treated rooms or something?You’re right, most people won’t have treated rooms. My own room isn’t treated, however that doesn’t change anything about what I said.
I know almost nothing about room treatment, but it seems to me a key feature of these particular speakers is their claimed ability to adapt to the room they’re in (rather than have you adapt to it), so I’m not sure I follow on how you made that conclusion.But that's the only way to compare the speakers. All consumer rooms will have their own sets of issues. Different speakers will handle different issues differently. One can't expect Consumer Reports (or anyone else) to test the speakers in everyone's own room. The treated room is the better option.
Do you have listener preference data on treated rooms or something?
I know almost nothing about room treatment, but it seems to me a key feature of these particular speakers is their claimed ability to adapt to the room they’re in (rather than have you adapt to it), so I’m not sure I follow on how you made that conclusion.
They could for example try testing them in a random sample of common room types.
Apple, when they invited HomePod reviewers to a briefing, demoed it in “a fairly representative residential room,” according to John Gruber, but perhaps we should all be living in treated rooms instead.
Well I wanted it on top with my TV but doing that takes away some of the screen of my TV. Putting it on the side is where I had it but thought a more central area of the room would be a better fit.I would not put it there, the woofer shoots straight up and you’ll severely limit the soundstage it puts out.
Well I wanted it on top with my TV but doing that takes away some of the screen of my TV. Putting it on the side is where I had it but thought a more central area of the room would be a better fit.
I had an issue like this with a song that was recorded by my Dad (he was a good singer) and I tried asking for the song by song name and then told it to play by my dad's name and it didn't work. If I told her to play song name by my dad's name it worked fine.Well, so far so good with my HomePod. The sound is pretty wonderful.
I feel a little lost about the lack of control you have over it out of the box (i'm yet to start digging into the Home app). Even a little more documentation would be of help. I don't really call 3 small discs of paper a full set of documentation! Siri understands both me and my partners requests most of the time. I have noticed on track in my iTunes library that "she" refuses to acknowledge exists; yet I can still see and play it on both my iMac and my iPhone. Weird!
Its not weird at all, although its surprising...
The HomePod is constantly correcting the EQ based on the source (as artist intended) and what it hears via its microphones. Kind of like high end audio receivers during initial setup use a mic so it can listen to itself and set its frequencies based on speaker and listener location. The HomePod being an omnidirectional speaker is doing the same thing except constantly. This is important because location of a speakers has a very large effect on various frequencies.
Since the HomePod is correcting its EQ for the source you will need to alter the source so its correct the EQ to incorrect values (your preferences). AirPlaying from the Mac I can adjust EQ and I image presets provide in the iPhones/iPods will work as well.
The reason there likely isn't any generic presets is so they dont double it up. Presets in the phone altering the audio air playing to a HomePod that is further altering it.
Audio equipment should be purchased based on a lot of variables but the most important is the requirements of the owner. For example, you don't like boomy bass, therefore placing a high excursion woofer near your head where you sleep is probably not the best idea there are much better products for a nightstand out there for you. I would return it while you are still within the return window.
Some placement tips (gels with what I’ve understood from placement as well):
[doublepost=1518314571][/doublepost]Arve weighing in:
- Throw it near a wall or in a corner.
- raise it up off the table, onto something sturdy. It'll still sound good on a table, but if you've got a heavy block of some sort (like a box or a tiny speaker stand) it's highly suggested that you use that.
- almost all the other rules have changed. Enjoy your sound
Not saying everything is rosy: At extremely high volumes (measured 95-100 dB), there is a distortion peak at 500 Hz, which is likely where the "tweeters" have their maximum excursion, about 0.5-2 octaves above their -3 dB point.
- I've looked at ~100 dB-in-room measurements. The bass distortion is beyond spectacular, and I honestly don't think there is any bookshelf-sized speaker that doesn't employ computational audio that will come close
- They are for all intents and purposes constant-directivity, after they've had time to "settle" - the response takes a few minutes of playing music to settle before measurements are stable - indicative of machine learning being employed
- They use Fletcher-Munson-like loudness compensation, meaning that they measure differently at 75 and 95 dB. Whether you like this or not is an entirely subjective matter, but it cannot be turned off.
- Their response is to ~40 Hz, even at extremely high (~95-100 dB) volumes, and the bottom-end cutoff doesn't seem to be a moving target.
- I had a look at distortion measurements, and while I can't be completely definite, they appear to be better than those of the Kii Three. I'll have to get a pair of both to actually verify, but that one has me flabbergasted.
But the short answer is: If you can live with not being able to use it with a TV, it's something you should seriously audition, because I'm not entirely sure that there is a bookshelf speaker with a driver less than 6.5" that sounds better on the bottom end.
And:
The response below 400 Hz is flat without room modes actually flat without a single null. /u/WinterCharm also shared a different measurement with me - from a different distance, and 45 degrees off-axis. Only a single null showed up at ~110 Hz, and the speaker appears to be a constant-directivity design with very wide dispersion. How the hell Apple managed that is well beyond me, and could just as well be considered black magic, especially since they don't rely on externalized mic placements for the measurements.
So guess you think I should place mine here
![]()
And not under my TV?
Yes, what he said. You want your ATV sound to look like it’s coming from the TV it needs to be near the TV.Are you going to be AirPlaying audio paired to video from an ATV? If so, then that would be an objectively terrible place to put the speaker. For audio only, if it sounds good there then go for it.
Are you going to be AirPlaying audio paired to video from an ATV? If so, then that would be an objectively terrible place to put the speaker. For audio only, if it sounds good there then go for it.
2 sonos 5's and a sub in the bedroom I would not compare the two they are really different beasts. I mean for the cost of that setup I could find something better. but they sonos works great in the bedroom. the home pod is great for my wife to listen to her videos and podcasts and such. I think it has great bass for it's size. but I don't know how it will work as a stereo pair.You are the second disappointed Sonos Play 5 owner to post here.
Impressions from a Sonos Play 5 (gen 2) owner
I think it would be silly to think they would replace the sonos 5's they are far different beasts.I’ve tried two. I optimistically ordered four hoping to replace my Play 5s, I could open a third? No, I don’t think that’s a good idea either...At the moment at least two are going back because I’ll keep two for HomeKit support, but not to replace the Sonoses!
Yeah my plan would be to use it via my Apple TV as well which is why I moved it here
![]()
But if the sound is going to be affected putting it here I will have to rethink it
I wanted it on top where my TV is but I lose part of the screen doing this