Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Fair enough. Had to ask the question though. I too have had issues with Alexa, but for me it's actually BETTER than Siri. My best guess is that it's a combination of my personal history and what everyone else is asking for.
Don't misunderstand me, my friend. Alexa is much better at responding to voice commands for me as well. I suspect there's a reason for that to do with how much 'listening' the device does. That's the point of my earlier example.

I'm not sure how comfortable I am with the constant eavesdropping, but I will concede Alexa has become a far far superior voice assistant when compared with Siri. It's not even close.
 
Siri dominates in usage market share despite the fact that there are more Android devices out there worldwide. Why is it that Google Assistant isn't the one doing the dominating if it were simply a question of device numbers?



I control and monitor my entire house with Siri including the backyard Pool pump and pool heating, the robot vacuum cleaner, all the lights, the security cameras, multiple smart switches, 2 Apple TVs, a HomePod and multiple Macs. The only thing I can't control so far is my ducted Air conditioning, but that doesn't work with Alexa or Google either. And I have the reassurance that my home is far more secure and private than if it was controlled using Amazon or Google.
Heh. Just because it can be done doesn’t mean it can be done easily. I use both Siri and Alexa. Siri because I have to when I need a phone-based assistant, and Alexa when I want something that is generally intuitive and useful. Apple defined the market and led it when Siri was initiated. They should be ashamed of their incompetence that Alexa/Amazon kicked Siri’s ass so badly after such a huge head start. Apple stumbled into that innovation, but sadly they couldn’t capitalize, Amazon exploited their weakness.
 
Heh. Just because it can be done doesn’t mean it can be done easily. I use both Siri and Alexa. Siri because I have to when I need a phone-based assistant, and Alexa when I want something that is generally intuitive and useful. Apple defined the market and led it when Siri was initiated. They should be ashamed of their incompetence that Alexa/Amazon kicked Siri’s ass so badly after such a huge head start. Apple stumbled into that innovation, but sadly they couldn’t capitalize, Amazon exploited their weakness.

And yet the research says that Siri is more capable than Alexa since the last updates by Apple late last year.

LoupVentures reported recently that in their latest annual test of voice assistants, Siri's accuracy rate was 79% compared to Alexa on 61% and Cortana on just 52%. Siri was only 7% behind the leader, Google Assistant on 86%.

And Siri is improving at a faster rate of 22% (in 9 months) compared to only 7% for Google and 9% for Alexa in 12 months.

So not only does Siri have 3.5x the usage market share compared to Alexa, it is also 18% more accurate than Alexa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CreepyAF
And yet the research says that Siri is more capable than Alexa since the last updates by Apple late last year.

LoupVentures reported recently that in their latest annual test of voice assistants, Siri's accuracy rate was 79% compared to Alexa on 61% and Cortana on just 52%. Siri was only 7% behind the leader, Google Assistant on 86%.

And Siri is improving at a faster rate of 22% (in 9 months) compared to only 7% for Google and 9% for Alexa in 12 months.

So not only does Siri have 3.5x the usage market share compared to Alexa, it is also 18% more accurate than Alexa.
I’m waiting for the day when Siri can make calls and impersonate a human.


Anyhow Siri isn’t as bad as people make out. The google assistant is much more advanced and I didn’t think Apple are going to catch up anytime soon. There is an argument for Siri being better than Alexa but for now I’d give it to Alexa despite what that research claims. I have all 3. The study didn’t tap into the assistant’s advanced features, probably because the other 3 have no hope in hell or competing. It also didn’t take into account Alexa’s skills. It was basically asking questions and making commands which are basic things that all 3 of them can do.
 
Amazon is killing it in hardware. Their new Echo Show 2nd edition video+audio home assistant has frequently sold out. That hardware plus Google Assistant would be the end game while HomePod is pretty much DOA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sracer
I’m waiting for the day when Siri can make calls and impersonate a human.


Anyhow Siri isn’t as bad as people make out. The google assistant is much more advanced and I didn’t think Apple are going to catch up anytime soon. There is an argument for Siri being better than Alexa but for now I’d give it to Alexa despite what that research claims. I have all 3. The study didn’t tap into the assistant’s advanced features, probably because the other 3 have no hope in hell or competing. It also didn’t take into account Alexa’s skills. It was basically asking questions and making commands which are basic things that all 3 of them can do.
One should always take "research" undertaken by business organisations. They can skew the methodology to suit their own or their clients ends.
 
Amazon is killing it in hardware. Their new Echo Show 2nd edition video+audio home assistant has frequently sold out. That hardware plus Google Assistant would be the end game while HomePod is pretty much DOA.
I was hoping that the HomePod would be as flexible as my Google Home Mini ($20)+Chromecast Audio ($10)+IKEA Eneby speaker ($80) combo. It isn't... not even close. Although the HomePod sound quality is amazing, it doesn't sound 3x amazing to me.

I haven't tried the Echo yet, but I know I should. I've had great success expanding the Fire HD tablet and Fire TV far beyond what Amazon intended so those have been great values. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Echo perform similarly.

It shouldn't be a surprise that the HomePod is as locked down as it is. Perhaps consumer resistance to it isn't so much about the price or function but a loosening of Apple's grip that their ecosystem has on their customers (more people who enjoy Apple products are feeling less of a need to remain solidly in the ecosystem).
 
I was hoping that the HomePod would be as flexible as my Google Home Mini ($20)+Chromecast Audio ($10)+IKEA Eneby speaker ($80) combo. It isn't... not even close. Although the HomePod sound quality is amazing, it doesn't sound 3x amazing to me.

Hi Sracer, I'm interested to know what the HomePod can't do that you can do with the Home Mini, Chromecast Audio and Eneby speaker? I've personally found the HomePod quite capable in combination with my AppleTVs, Homekit, Security cameras, Philips Hue lights and smart power plugs so I'm curious to know what you found lacking?
[doublepost=1550411590][/doublepost]
One should always take "research" undertaken by business organisations. They can skew the methodology to suit their own or their clients ends.

You might like to know that Loup Ventures previously rated the HomePod and Siri lower than Alexa until Apple's late-2018 updates so I think we can trust this particular research group.
[doublepost=1550411809][/doublepost]
Amazon is killing it in hardware. Their new Echo Show 2nd edition video+audio home assistant has frequently sold out. That hardware plus Google Assistant would be the end game while HomePod is pretty much DOA.

3.6 million 350 dollar HomePods sold in the USA alone (let alone the rest of the world) generating 1.4 Billion dollars revenue for Apple is not what most people would call "DOA".
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
...
3.6 million 350 dollar HomePods sold in the USA alone (let alone the rest of the world) generating 1.4 Billion dollars revenue for Apple is not what most people would call "DOA".
Maybe people aren't aware or just like to place their own spin on things. I played with the homepods at an apple store, the sound is very good.
 
And yet the research says that Siri is more capable than Alexa since the last updates by Apple late last year.

LoupVentures reported recently that in their latest annual test of voice assistants, Siri's accuracy rate was 79% compared to Alexa on 61% and Cortana on just 52%. Siri was only 7% behind the leader, Google Assistant on 86%.

And Siri is improving at a faster rate of 22% (in 9 months) compared to only 7% for Google and 9% for Alexa in 12 months.

So not only does Siri have 3.5x the usage market share compared to Alexa, it is also 18% more accurate than Alexa.
How does “research” know what’s useful to me? I use both Alexa and Siri routinely. My personal “research” very clearly tells me that Siri sucks by comparison.
 
How does “research” know what’s useful to me? I use both Alexa and Siri routinely. My personal “research” very clearly tells me that Siri sucks by comparison.
Research helps people who are not currently working with both assistants understand the capabilities of each. But as they say your milage may vary. I think comments like these come from those of us who's personal experience with Siri is much better that what others say. It helps to ground our personal experiences with some data. Now this changes nothing for you. If Alexa works better for you then use it, but understand that others have different experiences.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.