It's called 'innovation', the stuff everyone complains that Apple doesn't have enough of.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hope for Optical Image Stabilization in iPhone 6 Revived with Supplier Rumors
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It's called 'innovation', the stuff everyone complains that Apple doesn't have enough of.
1, SW (=electronic) stab doesn't work in still mode, only during video shooting. The 5s has some kind of a still "stabilization", but it's pretty useless (as most IIS systems are) compared to a true, properly implemented OIS system according to, say, the DPReview test. (See the bottom section at http://connect.dpreview.com/post/7518611407/apple-iphone5s-camera-review?page=4 for more info.)
2, even in video mode, it has a VERY detrimental effect on the net result: it severely reduces the FoV to around 36mm on the 5s, 39mm on the 5c/5 and 42mm on the 4S/4. Those figures mean iPhones just can't shoot high-res videos with as wide a field-of-view as most other flagships, particularly those of Nokia.
----------
Me too. I'm perfectly happy with the 5, particulalry now that it's JB'n and can record calls.
The video looks far better than what Apple has been using. Perhaps I will no longer get nauseous and sea-sick when watching my wife's videos in the future.
Now, if we could only get TV producers to stop purposefully using camera motion in an attempt to add action to their shows.
Now, if we could only get TV producers to stop purposefully using camera motion in an attempt to add action to their shows.
We know we won't get all of the goodies in one phone, so some of this will have to wait for the 6S.
Sounds like a waste of money tbh. hy not just put a gyro on the camera's daughter board, and feed that signal into your software for stabilization? why spend all this money for basically the exact same thing from someone else?
Unfortunately, the way you described can't be used when shooting stills. Then, the electronics outside the sensor only receives one(!) image from the sensor. There is no point in trying to, say, read the sensor 10 times while shooting a, say, 1/15s image. Why? Because the result will be useless - the "photon buckets" just won't be filled in necessarily during the first, say, 7-8 reads, only in the last two or three. That is, you won't be able to combine those images or select the "best" of them.
What you've described is only workable in inter-frame stabilization; that is, typically with video stab. Actually, this is how electronic IS works (with an additional 10-20% outer frame area so that they can also crop). Unfortunately, EIS is still inferior to OIS systems when it comes to sensor usage. (See my earlier comments here for the why's.)
All in all, OIS is sorely missing from iDevices and I can only welcome it to the iPhone 6.
----------
You meant the other way around?
With a decent OIS, you will have a lot of keepers even of shots you take at 1/4s or 1/8s, as is also shown by the Nokia 92x / 1020. This keeper rate is plain impossible with no-IS systems like the iPhone. Then, most of even the 1/15s shots are blurred.BTW, the ability to use longer exposure means using lower ISO's, which, in turn, may result in better color saturation. (Many noise reduction algorithms severely reduce color saturation at higher ISO's in order to reduce color noise, which is, in general, much more disturbing than luminance noise. Hence the seemingly unnecessary dialed-down color saturation in many consumer cameras.) In this case, however, the "blurred" photo doesn't show the effects of reduced color saturation.
Sorry for being a bearer of bad news, but no one should expect large (larger than 1/1.5") sensors in any thin (less than 8 mm) phones. It's physically impossible. No wonder Nokia's 808 and 1020 have such huge camera "bumps". We'll be happy if we see as large sensors as 1/2.5" in an iPhone, and even that is highly unlikely, unless Apple increases the thickness of the phones. The latter is VERY unlikely.
Another completely unrelated issue is having OIS. It's certainly possible to have a proper OIS module even so thin a device, as is also proved by the LG G2 or the HTC One.
"near-pro camera"? I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this, but the sensor in these cameras is tiny.
A professional camera has a sensor around the size of an ipod shuffle. The iPhone camera sensor is about the size of the 'play' symbol on an ipod shuffle.
An iPhone is to a professional camera, as a toothpick is to a professional baseball bat.
Hey, sharp pictures would be lacking that sneaky illegitimacy, and just wouldn't have that believable 'smuggled' look