...Create a PRO model with PRO OS! Shared file repository, file management, multiple display multitasking, USB connection, etc.
Want iPad to continue to be a high utilization device with increasing sales?
Create a PRO model with PRO OS! Shared file repository, file management, multiple display multitasking, USB connection, etc.
Who's with me?
Want iPad to continue to be a high utilization device with increasing sales?
Create a PRO model with PRO OS! Shared file repository, file management, multiple display multitasking, USB connection, etc.
Who's with me?
Apple has demonstrated that it will change their feelings to suit consumers. 🙂 If an iPad Pro comes to fruition, it won't be because of those who state that they want one but by those who have purchased Windows-based hybrids.This will never happen. Windows 10 being a universal platform, further fragmentation of Apples OS systems makes little sense. If anything, Apple will continue the work to bridge iOS and OS X through cross platform integration and support.
Plus, Apple made it clear how they feel about "pro" applications. Aperture, anyone?
Want iPad to continue to be a high utilization device with increasing sales?
Create a PRO model with PRO OS! Shared file repository, file management, multiple display multitasking, USB connection, etc.
Who's with me?
I would love to see an iPad with the same specs as the new MBook with detachable keyboard. Got to have a USB 3 and cellular!
I think we will be seeing a iPad Pro this year, the question is how much freedom Apple will allow it. If still tied so everything has to go through iTunes . . . .well the Surface 4 Pro will be here sooner.😱
What do you mean it's tied to iTunes, and why is it a bad thing?
It seems like a lot of people want to make the iPad into something it's never going to be. Tablets are not going to replace laptops.
If you want all that functionality that's when you buy a Macbook Air or the new Macbook.
What do you mean it's tied to iTunes, and why is it a bad thing?
It seems like a lot of people want to make the iPad into something it's never going to be. Tablets are not going to replace laptops.
If you want all that functionality that's when you buy a Macbook Air or the new Macbook.
Why shouldn't they? They definitely have the potential, and a lot of people just prefer the iOS ecosystem. What makes you think that tablets will always be a step behind something that has just been building on something that was made 25 years ago? Tablets are the future!
iPads have always been restrictive, but each iOS reduces that. At the moment I cannot do everything I can on a Mac, or its super hard or clunky. If that reduces, and I can do everything, some of which are a little less convenient, thats a good situation. Currently I see my iPad Air as great for watching/reading/playing only
iPads have always been restrictive, but each iOS reduces that. At the moment I cannot do everything I can on a Mac, or its super hard or clunky. If that reduces, and I can do everything, some of which are a little less convenient, thats a good situation. Currently I see my iPad Air as great for watching/reading/playing only
You're forgetting the name of this thread. iOS Pro. The point the OP is trying to get across is that this would be a less restrictive (whatever that means) OS. That and pro apps. I wasn't saying that they were enough to fully match laptops now, but the fact that they have a future.
This is precisely the point!
If Apple is going to create a pro line of tablets, it needs to distinguish itself from the 'regular' line. And though I'm not a tech guy, I'm pretty sure that the Air 2 has more than enough power to do many of the things a 'pro' line needs to do. It's the software that presents most of the limitations. (not all, but most) So by upgrading the software to encompass 'pro' features, and giving the hardware enough juice to do the job, a pro version of the iPad could really be a great hybrid device.
I don't see why software has to be created specifically for a "pro" line of iPads, instead of letting all iOS devices access those features directly.
File management, split displays and even support for USB-C are something that could benefit both iPhones and iPads equal, not just a larger iPad. If you want developers to support said feature, it should be something accessible on as many devices as possible to make it worth their while, rather than being restricted to what is probably a niche market at best.
Likewise, software like final cut pro or photoshop for iOS is not something you really need a dedicated file directory or split-screen capabilities for anyways. Assuming all specs equal, I don't see why an app designed to run on an "iPad pro" should run on an iPad air...
I would agree with you that many of the features you've discussed should be included to work on all of the latest versions of the iPad.
But the logical extension of your argument is that there is no distinction between a "pro" iPad and an iPad, save for some updated hardware specs. And the question then becomes whether that alone is enough to distinguish between a pro line and a regular line of iPads. I'm not convinced it is.
I don't see why software has to be created specifically for a "pro" line of iPads, instead of letting all iOS devices access those features directly.
File management, split displays and even support for USB-C are something that could benefit both iPhones and iPads equal, not just a larger iPad. If you want developers to support said feature, it should be something accessible on as many devices as possible to make it worth their while, rather than being restricted to what is probably a niche market at best.
Likewise, software like final cut pro or photoshop for iOS is not something you really need a dedicated file directory or split-screen capabilities for anyways. Assuming all specs equal, I don't see why an app designed to run on an "iPad pro" should run on an iPad air.
I just don't see the merits of your argument here.