Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DC Wallaby

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 22, 2014
155
140
Daring Fireball linked to this article, which is a fascinating look at the processes Apple used in manufacturing the various metals to make the Apple Watch collections. For all the people wondering why they'd charge as much as they do ... I think this has something to do with it. Gruber noted this excerpt:

Jony Ive often speaks of care. It is an odd word to use as it doesn’t imply the traditional notion of “craftsmanship” in the classic, handmade sense. Nor does it imply quality or precision in the way a Japanese car manufacturer or German machine tool maker would. “Care” implies a respect for the raw materials and end result, with little concern about what it takes to link those two ends of the production chain together, and we see that highlighted with the Watch. Apple could very easily have forgone forging to create stainless steel cases, just like everyone else. Hardening gold alloy with cold working could have been eliminated, putting them on par with the rest of the industry. Nobody will see or feel the inside pocket for the microphone on the Sport, yet it has been laser finished to perfection.

I see these videos and I see a process that could only have been created by a team looking to execute on a level far beyond what was necessary or what will be noticed. This isn’t a supply chain, it is a ritual Apple is performing to bring themselves up to the standards necessary to compete against companies with centuries of experience.

Yes, Apple could certainly charge less and do less. But when has that ever been Apple's style? Yes, the Apple Watch is at its heart a computing device. But the level of dedication and care that has gone into designing the casing is nothing short of incredible, and that is a huge aspect of what this device is. And if that's the case, why would Apple charge anything less than what the manufacturing process is worth?

I think this allayed a lot of my fears in regards to the pricing of the Watches. Pretty impressive, when you think about it.
 

chfilm

macrumors 68040
Nov 15, 2012
3,306
1,987
Berlin
Sweet! :) Nothing less than I'd expect of a Johnny Ive.
They're lucky they still have him. Picture he and Steve wouldve died together in a plane crash or somehting. They couldve shut the company down.
 

8CoreWhore

macrumors 68030
Jan 17, 2008
2,653
1,191
Tejas
I see the 6 pin ports in the videos for each of the 3 watch types. And I find it hard to believe Apple would show us something that won't be there.

He speculates that unlike the SS and gold, the aluminum watch will be glued in place, and as such, maybe the 6 pin port will remain for the aluminum but not the other two.

I doubt this as it would also mean the battery on a $400 dollar watch is not replaceable. No way.
 

chabig

macrumors G4
Sep 6, 2002
11,259
8,955
I find it hard to believe Apple would show us something that won't be there.

I agree. I think the port will be on the shipping watch. However, the port may never have a consumer purpose, and may remain strictly for troubleshooting and loading the OS at the factory (I doubt they're making wireless connections to millions of watches for the purpose of loading software, whereas we can do wireless updates at home).
 

Luba

macrumors 68000
Apr 22, 2009
1,781
370
Koenig theorizes that in the Sport the watch "movement" is glued on, but in the SS and gold, the "movement" can be replaced since it's not glued. This would mean a generation 2 "movement" could be inserted in. Would Apple have customers hand-in their old SS cases and pay to have an upgraded generation 2 movement??
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.