Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Fortune Article - part 3

More important than direct software sales are the growth opportunities Apple's "user experience" prowess might open up. Owning a 62% market share of the online music market, for instance, augurs serious sales growth. Even though that market is still in its infancy—downloads accounted for less than 2% of U.S. music sales in 2004—the iPod platform, for example, kicked in revenues of $1.4 billion in Apple's first fiscal quarter, nearly as much as it did in the previous four quarters combined. Merrill Lynch analyst Steve Milunovich predicts that the iPod business alone will hit $6.2 billion in fiscal 2006, roughly as big as all of Apple when Jobs took over. (Of course, the iPod's growth will eventually flatten as the devices lose their fad status. Yet the gadgets are so useful that it's easy to imagine them becoming as ubiquitous as the Walkman—of which Sony has sold 340 million.)

With the iPod and iTunes Music Store, Apple has changed the rules of the game for three industries—PCs, consumer electronics, and music. And as new as its influence is, Apple appears to have nothing to fear from major rivals. Its software skills have consumer electronics companies at a major disadvantage that could take years to overcome (see "Saving Face at Sony"). Says Nathan Myhrvold, former chief of Microsoft Research: "Once audio and visual experiences become a combined hardware-software-network thing, the consumer electronics guys are fish out of water."

Apple has cast a shadow over Microsoft too. Jobs likes to say that the upcoming Tiger version of OS X will have everything that Bill Gates and Microsoft are promising in Longhorn, the often delayed major upgrade of Windows, now due in mid-2006. "They copied the original Mac with Windows 95," Jobs gloats, "and now they're going to be copying us again." (Microsoft declined comment.)

We promised earlier to tell you about Tiger. The software's most notable feature is Spotlight (that's a Spotlight icon at the top of this page). It's Apple's entry in the race to deliver a hot new capability called "desktop search." The idea is to be able to automatically scan your computer's hard drive to find files, e-mail, documents, pictures, music, and the like, much as Google scours the Internet. Desktop search promises to free users from a major headache: having to remember how files and folders are organized and particular pieces of information are stashed. Google is at work on a similar product, as an add-on piece of software; Microsoft plans to integrate desktop search in Longhorn.

Tiger is also loaded with features that Apple has included just because they're cool. An icon called Dashboard unlocks a bevy of handy Internet-enabled applications called widgets—windows that pop up at the touch of a key to display movie listings, the weather outlook, stock prices, a dictionary, a currency converter, a language translator, and the like, and then melt away just as quickly so you can get back to your work.

When you look at the brief history of OS X, and hear software experts like Bill Joy call it the best operating system in the world, you begin to realize what a remarkable accomplishment it has been for Apple—not only to build it but also to migrate millions of users to something so radically different with relatively little pain, and to improve it so dramatically and with such regularity that it has turned the endless nuisance of software support into a profit machine. The technology is so solid that Apple is beginning to sell Macs into markets that never before would even consider them, like the military and university supercomputer centers. Most tantalizing of all is scuttlebutt that three of the biggest PC makers are wooing Jobs to let them license OS X and adapt it to computers built around standard Intel chips. Why? They want to offer customers, many of whom are sick of the security problems that go with Windows and tired of waiting for Longhorn, an alternative. And besides, Apple has buzz now, and Microsoft does not.

Regardless of whether OS X starts showing up in PCs, it looks like Apple, a company that has had its share of ups and downs over the years, has finally mapped out a durable growth path. Sales will likely reach the $13 billion mark this year, thanks largely to the updraft from the iPod and the new $99 iPod shuffle. But there also appears to be a swelling of demand for the Mac product line, helped by the new budget-priced Mac Mini. If Apple can double its personal-computer market share in, say, the next two years (which still wouldn't put much of a dent in the sales of other PC makers), it would be well on its way to becoming a $20 billion company. And that doesn't even take into account what else Steve might have up his sleeve. Apple now has more than $6.5 billion in cash, ample to fund R&D, which last year consumed about $500 million.

Jobs is always coy about where Apple technology might pop up next, but occasionally he'll drop hints. At the recent Macworld trade show, he declared 2005 to be the year that high-definition video hits the mainstream, and touted the HD editing capabilities of a new version of iMovie. He also notes that a new generation of Wi-Fi networking gear is in the offing next year, which will offer enough bandwidth to finally make it possible to stream high-quality video from Macs to TVs. (In the short term, look for Apple to use its wireless technology to let HDTV owners display slideshows of digital photos stored on their Macs.)

Jobs also talks about alliances that will expand Apple's influence. "We're partnering with Motorola for doing things on cellphones, partnering with HP on the iPod, partnering with car companies and with the record companies. And we definitely will be partnering more and more."

There is one immense uncertainty hanging over Apple, however. Last July, Jobs was diagnosed with a rare islet-cell neuroendocrine tumor on his pancreas. In most cases, pancreatic cancer quickly turns lethal. Fortunately, this particular type can sometimes be treated with surgery, and experts say the procedure has a relatively good five-year survival rate—approaching 50%. [After presstime, FORTUNE spoke with the chief of surgical oncology at the Stanford University Medical Center, where Jobs was treated, who stated that in their experience the "cure rate" (instances in which the cancer is successfully removed, never to return) for the type of procedure Jobs had is between 80% and 90%. The "survival rate" cited in the previous sentence is for a broader set of procedures, and hence is overly pessimistic. FORTUNE regrets the error.] Jobs had part of his pancreas removed in late July, returned to work six weeks later, and has been cancer-free ever since. He says he’s feeling better than ever.

That illness only serves to remind investors and fans how crucial Jobs is to Apple. Jim Collins, the management guru who wrote the bestseller Built to Last, calls him the "Beethoven of business." Jobs may not be a programmer or a designer or an engineer or an MBA, but he has matured into a shrewd business strategist. And his perfectionist's penchant for the aesthetics of the user experience is the DNA that makes Apple such a distinctive and creative enterprise. Apple has to hope this particular genie won't disappear.
 
Blue Velvet said:
Umm... I think Europe has come on some way in the last 100 years.

Besides, it's still a huge and growing market.

A bit off topic and a complex issue, but quickly...

Absolutely Europe has improved and grown over the past 100 years. But 100 years ago, the world revolved around Europe. 100 years ago, European powers either directly or indirectly controlled the middle east, africa, asia, and india. Europe dominated the world politically, economically, and socially.

Not the case anymore. Europe is no longer the powerhouse it was geopolitically. 2 moronic wars, regressive taxation and socialism, among other things, tend to be detrimental to growth. The US seems to have taken over. This is, in my opinion the primary reason the EU was created.

Also, your link doesn't really help the cause. That population growth is about .3%. Hardly signs of robust growth. Barely above replacement numbers(births vs. deaths). Wild population growth isn't a good thing, but some growth is important. Negative growth is definitely bad. Especially if your dependent on tax revenue for social programs. There are also other bigger issues of course, like coping with post-industrial economies and capitalism in general.

I'm not trying to put down Europe. Its still important. But its just a fact that its glory days are largely in the past. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. And the trend seems to be saying that in 50 years, if not sooner, China and asia will become the economic center of the world, surpassing the US.
 
Cluelessness Abounds

Sorry, but you people who think you have a clue about the Premiere, FCP, and the iApps are out of it. I was on the Premiere team from 94-98. FCP was started in 95 when Randy Ubilos and some Photoshop guys were lured away by Macromedia. Premiere was somewhere between a $9 - 12 mil dollar per year product. Adobe was always unhappy about this low number and we were considered for spin-out or being sold off. The problem then was that capture hardware was expensive. Apple didn't come out with the iMac DV until 99. Why would Adobe spend money to develop a product with smaller revenue potential than a product they already had some issues with? I think Apple is the only company that could afford to build the iApps.
 
jmsait19 said:
Not wanting to start anything here but I've had two CAD classes. One in which we used Vectorworks and one in which we used AutoCAD. And I have to say that AutoCAD blows vectorworks out of the water. Vectorworks will draw things and stuff all good but AutoCAD was so much easier to use. If they ported AutoCAD so many people would then be enabled to switch.

AutoCAD may be easier to use as a beginner, but the program is INCREDIBLY inefficient to use compared to Vectorworx. On top it's an RSI nightmare if you use it intensively, I can't tell you how many of my friends (myself included) have had RSI problems because of autoCAD, it's a scandal. Vectorworx may have a little less features but it's a lot smarter in they way it works. I've used it for a short period during my traineeship and I fell in love with the program immediately. I think the difference between both programs is in some way comparable to XP and OSX in how it has been made userfriendly. Also friends that have used it at their traineeship were wild about this program; my experience was you can draw at least twice as fast and with many times less frustration.
Also, in the architectural world it has a growing impact, and most leading (high-profile) architectural offices in the Netherlands use it. It's a real shame it is not included in the curriculum of my faculty.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.