Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
I deleted a 20Gb iPad backup through 'about my Mac.' One would think that should give me 20Gb extra space. What I got instead was exactly 0Gb extra space. Did I misunderstand elementary school math? I don't understand how to get more free space if deleting files results in no extra space.

It seems MacOS has a very opaque way of managing space.
 

TiggrToo

macrumors 601
Aug 24, 2017
4,205
8,838
I deleted a 20Gb iPad backup through 'about my Mac.' One would think that should give me 20Gb extra space. What I got instead was exactly 0Gb extra space. Did I misunderstand elementary school math? I don't understand how to get more free space if deleting files results in no extra space.

It seems MacOS has a very opaque way of managing space.
Did you empty the trash?

Also, was it really 200GB or just reporting 200GB (e.g. a sparse file). Also it could have been a hard link and not the final file.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RPi-AS

Nermal

Moderator
Staff member
Dec 7, 2002
20,638
4,036
New Zealand
If you go to About This Mac and check the storage tab, you may find that the free space is showing in there. It seems to take some time for Finder to update.
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
Did you empty the trash?

Also, was it really 200GB or just reporting 200GB (e.g. a sparse file). Also it could have been a hard link and not the final file.
I deleted it through 'about my mac' which does not send things to the trashcan (and just to make sure I emptied the trashcan). One would assume that Apple's utility knows how to delete a file completely.
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
There’s also APFS snapshots to consider. A local backup of the computer’s prior state can exist
Yes, I read about this. How long does it keep that copy? I did an actual TM back to my backup disk, and I would assume then it deletes the local backup. But still I gained nothing.
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
If you go to About This Mac and check the storage tab, you may find that the free space is showing in there. It seems to take some time for Finder to update.
Unfortunately, about this mac also shows no extra space.
 

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,420
5,532
Horsens, Denmark
Yes, I read about this. How long does it keep that copy? I did an actual TM back to my backup disk, and I would assume then it deletes the local backup. But still I gained nothing.
Doesn't matter that you did the TM backup to disk. The idea is that if you bring your computer away from your TM backup, you can still access backups to some degree.

I'm honestly not entirely sure about retention but it should be marked as "purgeable" space. - So it's not per se free, but if you're actively trying to use the space it should just transparently make it available.
You can also manually inspect and purge the snapshots.
To list you Time Machine made APFS snapshots you can use this
1623744989044.png

To just generally query the disk about APFS snapshots you can do
1623745042899.png
 

BrianBaughn

macrumors G3
Feb 13, 2011
9,637
2,408
Baltimore, Maryland
I'm thinking the problem is that in most circumstances, by default, users don't have control over the storage in macOS…due to Photos and other iCloud document syncing as well as backup management.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsound1

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would say this is a plot by Apple to make you buy larger drive space. The amount of storage used can only go one way: increase. It is impossible to decrease the amount of space used on a drive!
 

Boyd01

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 21, 2012
7,681
4,568
New Jersey Pine Barrens
I would check again later. In Catalina I noticed that changes in free space were not always reflected immediately. 20gb (not 200gb!) is pretty small. A year or so ago, I deleted a few hundred gigabytes and was not seeing any change in free space. After messing around for awhile, I gave up. When I checked again after awhile, the free space was finally shown.

I don't buy your "conspiracy theory". That would not be very smart if a company is trying retain customers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RPi-AS and kevcube

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
I would check again later. In Catalina I noticed that changes in free space were not always reflected immediately. 20gb (not 200gb!) is pretty small. A year or so ago, I deleted a few hundred gigabytes and was not seeing any change in free space. After messing around for awhile, I gave up. When I checked again after awhile, the free space was finally shown.

I don't buy your "conspiracy theory". That would not be very smart if a company is trying retain customers.
That was a joke: I used ‘were.’ I am not a conspiracy theorist.
 

macsound1

macrumors 6502a
May 17, 2007
819
848
SF Bay Area
I do agree that while some of the functionality of APFS and macOS that allow you to duplicate files without actually making another copy that saves space is nice, it is overly convoluted how storage space is actually used on your device.

Also, while versioning of files is also nice and file size would be relatively small on something like a word document, there isn't alot of transparency about how versions and local TM snapshots work.

It almost should be below the file name or in the title bar when the file is open.
Something l like: "256kb document, with 8 versions 1.3MB"
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
I would check again later. In Catalina I noticed that changes in free space were not always reflected immediately. 20gb (not 200gb!) is pretty small. A year or so ago, I deleted a few hundred gigabytes and was not seeing any change in free space. After messing around for awhile, I gave up. When I checked again after awhile, the free space was finally shown.

I don't buy your "conspiracy theory". That would not be very smart if a company is trying retain customers.
But the serious part of the 'conspiracy theory' is this: my drive is running low on space. I'm pretty sure a lot of stuff on the drive is junk, wouldn't be surprised if it's more than 100Gb. So, I use 'About this Mac' to delete some of the junk, but I get no more free space. The end result is that the only solution is to upgrade from a 512GB drive to 1TB drive. No, Apple does not do that on purpose to scam customers, but it's still uncomfortable that the space management is so opaque. As a customer you have no way to make an informed decision if you should get the bigger drive.
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
14,631
20,858
Really dumb question here....have you rebooted? Maybe run first aid in Disk Utility so it re-indexes?
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
Really dumb question here....have you rebooted? Maybe run first aid in Disk Utility so it re-indexes?
Yes, thanks, I did in the hope that would free my space; no luck. The computer is one week old, so one wouldn't think first aid should be needed.

Here is another theory (and since the space management is so opaque, one can really only guess). Apple tries to keep around 10% space as free. As weak evidence: I have two MacBooks that have identical software and data (synced through Dropbox/iCloud), but are not copies of each other. For example, this 20Gb iPad backup was on only one computer. Yet, they both have around 50GB free.
 

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,420
5,532
Horsens, Denmark
Yes, thanks, I did in the hope that would free my space; no luck. The computer is one week old, so one wouldn't think first aid should be needed.

Here is another theory (and since the space management is so opaque, one can really only guess). Apple tries to keep around 10% space as free. As weak evidence: I have two MacBooks that have identical software and data (synced through Dropbox/iCloud), but are not copies of each other. For example, this 20Gb iPad backup was on only one computer. Yet, they both have around 50GB free.

How do you measure free anyway? Do you include purgeable storage? Anything purgeable is still "available to use" but is not free here and now
1623780199947.png


Did you try checking for snapshots?
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
How do you measure free anyway? Do you include purgeable storage? Anything purgeable is still "available to use" but is not free here and now
View attachment 1793690

Did you try checking for snapshots?
How to you see purgeable space? The free space I report is what both 'About my Mac' and Finder gives me; they don't say anything about purgeable space. I know you can check for snapshots with tmutil, but how can you see the size of them? Thanks
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
OK, I found it in diskutil. It tells me purgeable space is 0. So, again that makes it more of a mystery where those 20GB went.
 

rpmurray

macrumors 68020
Feb 21, 2017
2,148
4,319
Back End of Beyond
Last edited:

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,420
5,532
Horsens, Denmark
How to you see purgeable space? The free space I report is what both 'About my Mac' and Finder gives me; they don't say anything about purgeable space. I know you can check for snapshots with tmutil, but how can you see the size of them? Thanks
There's not per se an easy way to do this, since it's deltas not entire file sections in the local snapshots.

But this person on Reddit has a little thing that gives you delta drift
https://www.reddit.com/r/MacOS/comments/f8ducl
Your path would be somewhere under like /Volumes/com.apple.TimeMachine.local/Backup.backupdb/computerName
or something like that

Command can take quite a while to run, btw
You get an output similar to this thought I can't vouch for its accuracy. It feels like too much in my case

1623782144294.png
 

casperes1996

macrumors 604
Jan 26, 2014
7,420
5,532
Horsens, Denmark
Yeah, no, I dunno what went crazy when I ran it there but that was definitely not the proper sizes. After deleting them, since I have the TM Backup proper anyway, I only regained 60GB :)

I dunno, play around with it a bit. You can also use the tmutil thinlocalsnapshots (if memory serves that's its name at least) to not outright delete your local snapshots but just thin them by some amount, which will follow the same behvariour the system would use if it were so low on disk space it'd automatically start killing off old backup data locally.

I of course also can't guarantee snapshots have anything to do with your issue at all :)
 

ahostmadsen

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Dec 28, 2009
1,095
834
The Finder and macOS are a steaming pile when it comes to determining the amount of free space on a drive formatted in APFS. What you need is to use an app like DaisyDisk that is written by actual professional programmers instead of the amateur-hour stuff that Apple foists on us. I mean how long has APFS been out and they still can't get something like this right?

Where did all that free space go on my APFS disk?
Quantum computing and APFS: free and used space
I have been using OmniDiskSweeper. But that also gives odd results: it tells me my photo library is 0GB, while it's 200GB according to Finder.

Here is another way to calculate my usage. I have 200GB in my photos library, 40GB in my Dropbox, and 60GB in Applications, total 300GB. How much space does Big Sur itself take up? 20GB? That leaves 180GB that should be 'free.' But I only have 50GB free. So, there must be 130GB that is various degrees of junk.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.