Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How did they do this effect?
- Thread starter matteusclement
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
BWAHAHAHAHA....
That's what happens when you post at 2AM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAXtDPKkOlA
That's what happens when you post at 2AM.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAXtDPKkOlA
I have no idea about the capabilities of Motion or After Effects, but I wonder if the look could be achieved with multiple cameras and some wicked transitions using Motion or the like between the different camera angles?
Just a thought (I remember seeing an ad or something where they had set up a huge number of T2i cameras to shoot something).
Cheers
Just a thought (I remember seeing an ad or something where they had set up a huge number of T2i cameras to shoot something).
Cheers
I guess if you had 10 cameras and then key framed some horizontal blur for the effect of motion... it should work. The video just seems a little old to do that .
I kinda thought it was something like described here:
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=415039
http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=415039
I reckon it's multiple cameras/single camera with multiple takes (easier with music videos as there are auditory cues).
Then a 3d scene is created in AE with a 3d camera that just tracks through the various scenes at various points.
Simple in concept but probably quit difficult to construct with all the rendering power required!
Then a 3d scene is created in AE with a 3d camera that just tracks through the various scenes at various points.
Simple in concept but probably quit difficult to construct with all the rendering power required!
Doubtful. That seems more complicated than necessary. I'm sure it's much like the method discussed in mBox's link. An array of cameras capturing the same take from multiple angles, then composited and morphed in post.
It might be more complicated but it would be more accurate motion blur and easier to adjust angles once all the frames had been set up.
I don't think it would be more accurate at all. There's no reason to set the frames up in 3D in AE if you're just transitioning between 2D frames. AE's camera doesn't offer anything at that point, unless you're adding actual effect elements. And if that's the case, only any new effect layers would need to be 3D enabled.