How did we not notice the "washed out" display quality of the iPad Mini with Retina Display during its unveiling. Not to mention the numerous hands on reviews and impressions given by the selected press.
Was everyone just enamored by the iPads that we didn't notice? Maybe they were different display qualities at the event? OR maybe this thread was a mistake and everyone but me noticed?
I can only speak to my opinion, but over the past few days I've realized that my biggest gripe with the new retina iPad mini is the price of it relative to the full size iPad. When I got the original mini, it was $329, and I was willing to accept any "deficiencies" it had to the latest and greatest tech because it was priced far enough away from the iPad.
I've realized now that if the retina iPad mini was still $329, I wouldn't care nearly as much, or at all, for the color gamut issue. But it's $400 ...
Basically what I see on the market now is:
iPad mini - $239 on ebay deals, older A5 processor, non-retina display (even cheaper on Craigslist if you look hard enough)
+ $160 - newer A7 processor, retina display for sharpness only
+ $100 - (iPad Air) bigger screen, better color coverage (gamut)
Eh, it's too much of a price increase for what I think is minimal gain, so I've decided to go with the non-retina mini. Newer faster processor doesn't matter much as you can only run one app at once, and while loading times may be faster, most content once it starts plays perfectly fine. I can wait a few extra seconds for things to load.