How do we stand with UK "super injunctions"?

Discussion in 'Site and Forum Feedback' started by Fuzzy14, Apr 26, 2011.

  1. Fuzzy14 macrumors 65816

    Fuzzy14

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Location:
    Renfrew, Scotland
    #1
    There is a lot of press in the UK just now about world-wide bans on talking about something that somebody doesn't want you talking about, so called super-injunctions.

    For instance, Andrew Marr just admitted to having one but he admitted it so we can talk about it, but Imogen Thomas has got one so we can't talk about which Premiership footballer she bedded. (but if you put the name Imogen Thomas into twitter.com you'll find out the name.)

    So, how much trouble can we get MacRumors into if any of this kind of thing is discussed on here? Is there jurisdiction? Will arn get arrested next time he comes to the UK on holiday? Joking aside, I don't want to get the site a fine. Or myself arrested.


    Anybody else see that Ryan Giggs scored tonight?
     
  2. Consultant macrumors G5

    Consultant

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    #2
    UK and some countries are more strict about celebrity privacy.

    However, arn doesn't offer celebrity gossip.
     
  3. Fuzzy14 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Fuzzy14

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Location:
    Renfrew, Scotland
    #3
    No, but people post gossip on some of the forums. Just checking the site can't be held liable.
     

Share This Page