Ok, I'm gonna end this double posting stuff now haha. See my reply in the other threadSmart people like you will no doubt still have easy access to this information, but "regular" users like me rely on the indicator at the top by the battery icon. This move is meant to keep the average user in the dark. No doubt advanced users will download 3rd party apps or look in other built-in locations for this data. Ignorance is bliss for the masses (like me)!
It baffles me they can't just use "You are using 0.2% of your battery per minute. At your current power usage you have 4 hours remaining".
Boom, easy to understand, and no-one minds if it yo-yos as you fire up different programs.
If Apple is supposed to just say 8, don't forget to make every company *cough Microsoft* that greatly inflates their numbers higher than Apple inflates theirs be truthful too. No double standards with Apple (like so many forums posters have here).I think:
- It's hilarious and I'm glad that Apple still has the gall to do things like this... you're measuring it wrong!
- Apple needs to open up about the so-called 10 hours.
- They said to The Loop that they had been doing lots of testing and stand by the estimate. How?
- I know they detail the process of the test in the small print, but they don't tell you things like which "25 popular websites" they visit (because I bet it excludes Facebook and YouTube, the most popular websites), nor do they tell you if they literally try it with people in real circumstances, or whether it's actually just a simulation that is run
At the end of the day, 10 hours is a long time, but so is 8 hours. And I can get 8 hours quite reasonably. I'd rather Apple just straight up say "8 hour battery life".
- Apple needs to clarify what "up-to" means. Does this mean they ran their test a hundred times on a hundred machines, and one of them creeped over 10 hours once? Because that is hardly representative of what users should expect.
Would be nice. But Apple has recently been great with their battery estimates, ever since the iPad really. The MacBook Airs always outperformed their esitmates (well, from 2010 at least). And this has continued though to today's iPads and other products like the Watch which have way better battery life than listed.If Apple is supposed to just say 8, don't forget to make every company *cough Microsoft* that greatly inflates their numbers higher than Apple inflates theirs be truthful too. No double standards with Apple (like so many forums posters have here).
If we couldn't make car analogies we wouldn't have anything to talk aboutCar analogies are the worst analogies. Please stop lol.
Marketing was, it looks terrible. When this just happens to happen after reports flooding the Internet of terrible battery life, it looks like "hey. We aren't going to fix the battery issues. We are just going to make you not know how much battery is remaining!"Personally I dont care at all, I use percentages anyway.
But for Apple I think it was a marketing blunter. The story has been posted everywhere now and following reports of poor battery performance in the new MBP it just seems like a bad joke.
That said, I very much agree with Ghost31 that it was a very weird thing to do from the PR perspective. Already the crowd is claiming that this is happening in response to MBP battery criticisms.
That's because most likely, it was. The simplest answer is usually the correct one.
It's about the same as if Harley-Davidson were to remove the air temperature gauge from Electra Glides.
Well, the funny thing is that all the published tests I have seen so far show that the 15" MBP easily gets the advertised battery time and that its consistently better than the competition such as Dell XPS 15" and friends. Most of the battery life criticisms I have seen really appeared to rely on the remaining battery estimator.
I think the simplest explanation is that Apple decided to remove the thing simply because its not working properly. Of course, its very likely that the battery criticisms were the trigger. But honestly, if a feature that does not work properly is used to criticise a product, it kind of makes sense to remove it. I wouldn't be surprised though if Apple reintroduces it later, after they improve their estimation algorithms. Could be a neat little AI project for a masters or something![]()
but I can attest battery life can be really bad at times for no apparent reason
That sounds plausible for sure. Keep the complaining down to a minimum by hiding the poor battery life (or perception thereof, but I can attest battery life can be really bad at times for no apparent reason) and then reintroduce the feature when/if it is advantageous for Apple to do so.
Clearly at one point Apple thought this was a good enough "feature" to make it prominent in their OS, so now telling us it is either not useful or accurate is irritating to many users.
Guess I'll be downloading "iStat Menus"...![]()