They're upselling to people who cannot wait to buy it. If you wait, you can buy it from apple. So again, its not really a huge deal, unless you're willing to spend 10x the purchase price to be one of the first to own a given apple product.
And for the people who aren't buying from them, they're forcing them to wait a bit longer. Those are people who could have had the product and been putting it to good, productive use for days or weeks, who must then wait because some individual(s) bought a number of them purely with the intent of selling them to people who really wanted the product.
I know it's popular on the forum to assume that everyone buying Apple devices is doing so to watch movies on their couch, but some of us use these devices for work. It's not exactly a life-or-death situation, but there is a loss involved. What's upsetting about it isn't that Apple is misjudging the demand, but that people are inserting themselves between Apple and customers who are truly going to use the device... and if those parasites misjudged the demand, themselves, then they return the product to Apple, at Apple's cost. I don't see how anyone could possibly condone that. It isn't fair or right in any sense.
So you are deciding what are noble reasons for purchasing a product and which reasons are not? Do tell.
It isn't about "nobility." If I buy a quantity of a product that may be relatively scarce in quantity, only to turn around and sell it at a higher price, what value am I adding? If I hadn't bought ten copies of a device and ten individuals who were perfectly capable of purchasing that device from Apple are now turned away from the store because they're out of stock, did I somehow save them from anything? I did them a favor by somehow "getting copies for them"? That's similar to the mafia coming around for "protection money" to protect you from... themselves.
If you want to call it a business venture I might be able to believe it, were it not for the fact that these scalpers return unsold product to Apple. So not only are they not adding any value to the raised price, but they're making Apple eat the cost of their "investment." It's a parasitic practice.
First of all, a guy buying up 4 or 5 Apple Pencils can hardly be accused of "creating scarcity" or "manupulating the market". Out of the millions of items produced, "buying up a bunch" (if 4 or 5 could ever be considered a bunch) will not make a dent in the grand scheme of things.
Further, one could see the action of purchasing up a handful of a temporarily hard to find item as actually providing a service. As I have already posted, you pay for everything with either cash, time or effort.
I agree, one person engaging in those practices won't make a huge difference. It doesn't make the practice any less despicable, but one person won't be a problem. But did you see what happened to Apple when they first started selling the iPhones in China? It wasn't just one person. And I can guarantee you that it happens here, and that it isn't just one person, either. The number of scalpers here in the USA isn't anywhere near as bad as it was in China, but this is a practice that should not be encouraged.
I'm also curious to know what "service" you think these people are providing. Are they purchasing the devices to resell to people who can't travel to stores and/or can't order online? If so, then they are indeed providing a service, and adding on to the cost of the device is justifiable. But if they buy up a bunch of devices and then turn around to sell them on Craigslist and eBay, what service was provided? They're selling to an audience that was just as capable of buying from Apple as from them.
They're not "creating scarcity." Scalping couldn't even work unless the products are actually scarce, or people would just run into the store and buy their own, or wait a day and buy one. Why are there scalped Apple Pencils and not iPad Air 2s currently?
Of course they're contributing to scarcity. Have a theoretical scenario: Apple's supply chain has determined that there will be enough demand for the Pencil to justify stocking a local store with 20 Pencils. And they're not too far off, because there are roughly 18 people in your area who want to buy the Pencil. So your local Apple store gets 20 Pencils in stock... and I buy 15 of them. Five people made it to the store ahead of you, and you're number six. There are no Pencils for you. Would the Apple Pencil have been scarce if it weren't for me? It would not. By buying up an unusually large quantity, I have made the Pencil scarce in my region. Get enough like-minded people in play, and it's no longer just a local issue.
But let's continue with this theoretical example: you're not going to pay more than Apple's selling price for the Pencil, so you don't respond to my Craigslist or eBay ads. You're not alone: of the 15 Pencils that I bought, only three people have purchased them. A few weeks pass and now there's no backlog for Apple Pencils from the online store, and the local store has plenty in stock again. Nobody is going to buy the Pencils from me at my asking price. Rather than eat the loss, I go to the Apple Store and make a return on 12 Apple Pencils. Now Apple gets to eat the loss of having to restock, re-transport, and possibly re-inspect all of those Pencils. And when they release a new product, I repeat my cycle all over again.
If you're not bothered by that, you're either not thinking big enough (remember that if there's money to be made, there won't just be a single person trying to do it) or you're focusing too much on Apple ("they're rich enough, they can take it"). Imagine this happening to a struggling business instead; if that bothers you, then like me, you have a problem with this practice.