This is the most entertaining post in this thread.
Think what ever you are going to think, but if you reread the thread (specially your contribution) you'll see that others have used much stronger language against me than I ever did in my alleged
windows hate rampage.
Well, that is an amazing read of what happened.
Funny, as it looks like I pointed out that there were two philosophies on this point, one way (which Apple uses, but so does SGI and NeXT as examples of others) based on a rootless application environment and another way (used by Microsoft and StarOffice as two examples) based on a rooted application environment. And I fall squarely in the camp of the rootless application environment (even when Apple makes rooted apps), and I see no reason to apologies for that. Nor do I see how that can be read as me being a
windows hater. I just really don't like rooted applications and the philosophy that led to them.
The original poster was new to Macs, he deserved a clear explanation of why a feature he used while in Windows is not part of the Mac environment (but is part of the Windows environment).
No one here (specially not you

) has provided a legitimate argument that says that what I stated was wrong. Mainly because (even if I have a definite side on the rooted/rootless issue) the history of the choices made by these companies is well founded. All the companies and products I discussed had to make design choices that would have effected their implementations. In most cases (Apple and Microsoft) the reasoning behind those choices is not a secret.
Sadly, the technical aspects of all this seems to have escaped you. I guess when you can't comprehend things you default to simplified labels like
windows hater.
Well, at least your post made you look worse than it did me.

But it did give me another opportunity to restate my position, so thank you for your post...
Please post again.