Just asking. Or is this just for lonely ones who watch movies by themselves?
One of my best uses for the metaquest is watching with a buddy in a virtual bigscreen theater. Guess it won’t be a big deal as none of my friends can afford a AVPPossibly share play would be my guess. With that said, it’s a personal device. If I’m watching a movie with someone, it’s without the headset.
Which is what you can do in the meta aquestThe same way two people share binoculars together, obviously...
View attachment 2339031
Seriously though, it'd be sad if people are going to strap on headsets and disconnect from each other to watch a movie. Part of watching movies with someone else is the experience...to see their reactions and emotions. Can't do that with a headset strapped to your face.
Now if it was a remote/virtual watch party, then it would be cool to be in your own personal virtual movie theater. Maybe even see the faces you're watching with around you.
They'll probably add a feature like that to the Apple ecosystem later; when the cheaper version meant for a general audience launches.Which is what you can do in the meta aquest
It's been fascinating to me to see how many people on MacRumors say they never watch a movie alone. I watch plenty of movies & tv shows with my family. But I also watch many by myself. Am I an outlier?
For some people it might though, like single-person households. And just because I don't have a bunch of people with me in my 200 sqft studio apartment all the time to watch movies, doesn't mean that I never interact with people, don't have a social life, don't watch things elsewhere with people together and so on.And to the guy that says "Do people not watch things alone?" sure they do! But this argument that it will replace a television or monitor, something that multiple people next to you can enjoy with you, is totally disingenuous.
Of course it will isolate you! All of this tech-enabled connectivity is a pale shadow of the real thing. This is why kids are all so mentally ill today. They have 5000 friends on social media apps but almost none of them are real friends. Everyone knows it and that's why there's such an emphasis on presenting a curated image. Friendship has become more performative than substantive in the social media era.Apple in press demos have been very adamant to press the idea that this is not a device designed to isolate you, they're doing this because they know it will isolate you.
I have little doubt that this and many other features will be developed over time.It’s curious that Apple apparently doesn’t have an implementation of SharePlay for the AVP...
And married people who don’t talk to each otherJust asking. Or is this just for lonely ones who watch movies by themselves?
Well, the iPad calculator app was never developed. I wouldn’t take anything as a given.I have little doubt that this and many other features will be developed over time.
And yet calculators exist on the iPad. In fact, Apple’s excuse for not creating a calculator app on the iPad is because they feel the existing ones are good enough.Well, the iPad calculator app was never developed. I wouldn’t take anything as a given.
Not quite: Steve Jobs didn't like the design they had, so they shipped the first iPad without one, and then it fell of the priority cliff: https://www.cultofmac.com/421893/why-the-ipad-has-never-shipped-with-a-calculator-app/And yet calculators exist on the iPad. In fact, Apple’s excuse for not creating a calculator app on the iPad is because they feel the existing ones are good enough.
I'm saying that Apple does a poor job of realizing the potential of the AVP for this initial release, in ways that would seem obvious and good for marketing.So you’re not denying this feature will someday exist, but instead that Apple themselves will not be the ones to make it happen.