And yes, I am saying that no ideas tend to be taken forward, fairly or unfairly, from projects that are considered to be complete disasters.
It's already happened.
'Tags' in Mavericks is definitely a derivative of how keywords work in Final Cut Pro X. It's exactly the kind of thing I was taking about.
So either you're wrong about ideas not being taken from it or Apple doesn't consider FCPX a disaster.
I mean, it just wasn't. It was specifically widely criticised for having an awful file management system that was completely unusable in practice and was widely mocked.
I'm surprised to read this because I really don't remember this at all. Bear in mind I'm specifically talking about features that could be useful to Finder. Perhaps you're taking about the ways in which FCPX managed media files behind the scenes? That's not at all what I'm referring to. I'm talking about the things one could do within the interface itself.
So yes, I know people complained that you could't take projects off-line while working. But that's not something you'd need in Finder. Turning files 'off' to the OS isn't really a feature I'd expect an OS to gain.
I'm specifically referring here to how keywords worked (which is how Tags work now) and how smart collections and being able to apply search terms to certain parts of a file (as opposed to the entire thing). Those are the kind of things I'm expecting to migrate over to Finder and OS X. And given that they've already started, with Tags, I don't think it's far-fetched to say they'll continue.
Last edited: