Any new protocols ? I assume 40-50 feet? So if you were in a typical 3 br 1800 sq ft home, as long as phone is there, watch would work ok?
Any new protocols ? I assume 40-50 feet? So if you were in a typical 3 br 1800 sq ft home, as long as phone is there, watch would work ok?
Any new protocols ? I assume 40-50 feet? So if you were in a typical 3 br 1800 sq ft home, as long as phone is there, watch would work ok?
...and in the spirit of this question, could you, for instance, go running with just the watch then "sync up" your run when you return to your phone...or are you essentially tethered to it?
If you are home, thought the watch can also connect with your wifi.
...and in the spirit of this question, could you, for instance, go running with just the watch then "sync up" your run when you return to your phone...or are you essentially tethered to it?
If you are home, thought the watch can also connect with your wifi.
No it cannot connect to your home wifi with the apple watch. That's a 100% fact. I'm not going to link the article again you'll have to look it up.
Any new protocols ? I assume 40-50 feet? So if you were in a typical 3 br 1800 sq ft home, as long as phone is there, watch would work ok?
Apple Watch uses BTLE and an AWDL/WiFi to communicate with the phone. If however both the watch and the phone are on the same network AND the network support Bonjour / ZeroConf, then the watch can be out of BT range and only use WiFi to communicate with the phone just fine.
True and false. The Apple Watch will not connect to your home's wifi - but it WILL connect to your phone via your phone's wifi hot spot.
So, the phone <-> watch range is about 300 feet.
The Apple Watch will not connect to your home's wifi
but it WILL connect to your phone via your phone's wifi hot spot.
No - it uses AWDL.
They spelled this out onstage at the March Keynote.
The Apple Watch and iPhone can talk to each other using the home Wifi network, giving you a greater connection range while at home.
Apple said:... Apple Watch also features Wi-Fi 802.11b/g and Bluetooth 4.0 to pair seamlessly with your iPhone.
Correct, and it doesn't have to be at your home only either. If your local gym or office has wifi, you can use also utilize this. You can keep your phone inside a locker or bag, and your watch essentially will connect to your phone WiFi instead of Bluetooth, which extends your distance by a lot, as long as you are still under the range of Wifi (what is the max range of wifi, anybody knows?)
Do you have a source for this? To my knowledge Apple has never mentioned AWDL nor anything related to peer to peer when discussing the Apple Watch. And it doesn't make sense since broadcasting such a powerful signal to reach the entire house with internal antennae would suck the watch battery dry, rather than just broadcasting the power needed to talk to a wifi hotspot with large external antennae.
Maybe you should re-read his post as well; he asked you for your source for the above information.Re-read what I said - in the house, on a WiFi network with Bonjour / ZeroConf, that's what the watch will use. When outside, the watch will use AWDL with the phone to transfer large-ish assets like images, etc. Makes sense?
and if your gym doesn't have wi-fi it won't connect to the phone out of bluetooth range?
most gyms don't have free wi-fi
My question is do you guys think they will both work on free wifi that requires you to accept or click before using the Internet. I often work in these environments and I kind of think the watch will have trouble connecting in these situations.