With all the talk about how this is the 10.5.0 release and that as expected there are bugs, though personally I don't hear as much about bugs as I do just plain criticism of stacks & their icons, lack of nested folders, icons especially for folders, the dock - mainly the UI and not the performance - though there has been some install issues, I was curious as I don't remember how long after 10.3 Panther and 10.4 Tiger were released was it before the 10.x.1 and eventually .2 updates came along?
And did they actually change any functionality with those updates based on feedback or was it simply bug fixes? Can we realistically expect Apple to address any of the UI issues with stacks and icons and such in a .1 or .2 release?
Lastly, why didn't any of these issues get reported during the dev. seeding. It seems like we would have heard more about this when the prior builds were being distributed.
And did they actually change any functionality with those updates based on feedback or was it simply bug fixes? Can we realistically expect Apple to address any of the UI issues with stacks and icons and such in a .1 or .2 release?
Lastly, why didn't any of these issues get reported during the dev. seeding. It seems like we would have heard more about this when the prior builds were being distributed.