Apple is not a one-man show.
...which is kind of annoying.Agreed. I wouldn't worry about the product quality dipping due to his absence. What worries me is the stock price dipping. I didn't invest in Apple just because of Jobs but, like that poster above you, many investors do think he IS Apple.
How important do you think Steve Jobs' input is to the long-term success of the iPhone?
Apple is Jobs and Jobs is Apple, it's simple as that.
He is the face of the company, he is the charismatic leader with a grand vision that all the Apple fans love.
Steve is not only a visionary though, he is a preventer as well, a preventer of bad management, bad decisions, bad influences and of the team falling apart.
Once he retires, Apple will become, much, much looser.
Correct. Apple is basically a giant tech company made up of some of the world's greatest engineers, scientists and leaders. Jobs is visionary, he's smart, and I'm sure they've already found a successor. They're not stupid. They plan these things out.Wrong, Apple isn't Jobs and Jobs isn't Apple.
When Steve came back he was smart enough to bring in people and surround himself with other great minds, it's just that Jobs gets all the credit. Apple will be find if Jobs does or doesn't come back.
I'm sure they've already found a successor. They're not stupid. They plan these things out.![]()
True, and while not a major issue, it's something Apple will have to look after - redefining stale/ dying, or even creating new markets. A few analysts think "the next big thing" could be an actual Apple TV, unlike the little black box they offer now.iPhone will be fine. It's a product that's been out for a while and is undergoing further refinement. Apple knows exactly what is going into iPhone 5 (of course) and probably has a good view of iPhone 6. Similarly, iPad 2 is in the can, and iPad 3 is under development.
However, the real problem is defining Apple's next big hit product. What is the next thing Apple will do after the iPad? This has alway been where Jobs had the biggest impact: defining the next big product and being the driving force behind its development.
Correct. Apple is basically a giant tech company made up of some of the world's greatest engineers, scientists and leaders. Jobs is visionary, he's smart, and I'm sure they've already found a successor. They're not stupid. They plan these things out.![]()
Again, Apple (I'm sure) has thought about all this. Do you really think they're that dumb?if it were only that easy, the issue isn't whether they have engineering talent or management talent, every year there is an influx of new talent from colleges and universities, but do they have the visionary to replace Steve. you don't find a visionary just off the shelf. and i'm not just talking about an inventor or someone who can come up with a gadget, but someone who can bring it all together and see how things can be made to fit together, and not just things that exist today but 5 years from now or even 10 years from now. that is the piece that is missing from most of these other tech companies. they all have good engineers and have good ideas but few have a Steve Jobs type who can put it all together.
Again, Apple (I'm sure) has thought about all this. Do you really think they're that dumb?
The only person who can pick a sucessor will be Jobs. No one else at Apple completely understands what is needed for a visionary. Steve Jobs is one in a billion.Again, Apple (I'm sure) has thought about all this. Do you really think they're that dumb?
Wrong, Apple isn't Jobs and Jobs isn't Apple.
When Steve came back he was smart enough to bring in people and surround himself with other great minds, it's just that Jobs gets all the credit. Apple will be find if Jobs does or doesn't come back.