How is Polaroid getting away with this look alike nano?

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by aziatiklover, Feb 26, 2012.

  1. aziatiklover macrumors 68030

    aziatiklover

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Location:
    8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4
    #1
  2. lewis82 macrumors 68000

    lewis82

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Location:
    Totalitarian Republic of Northlandia
    #2
  3. R94N macrumors 68020

    R94N

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #3
    I was going to say they perhaps don't want to kick them while they're down but Apple went after Kodak recently so I suppose that reason doesn't really work.
     
  4. JUiCEJamie macrumors 6502a

    JUiCEJamie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
  5. B777Forevar macrumors 6502a

    B777Forevar

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #5
    Wow, if that is what Polaroid resorted to, how the mighty have fallen.

    From wonderful instant cameras to that thing :(
     
  6. LatinGeek macrumors newbie

    LatinGeek

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2012
    #6
    It's probably not even polaroid, maybe a chinese knockoff.
    You know, like the other TEN MILLION.
     
  7. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #7
    The cost would outweigh the benefit, as the iPod Nano isn't a very profitable sector for Apple.
     
  8. niuniu macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #8
    Googling is too hard. Much easier to suggest it's a knock-off :rolleyes:
     
  9. senseless macrumors 68000

    senseless

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    #9
    "Polaroid"; yeah right. Edwin Land would not be pleased.
     

Share This Page