Air uses 5W chips, and a dual core chips. Not really comparable at all with X1C. That new Air isn't Air at all. It's just a bigger Macbook with 2 TB3 ports.
The MacBook Air reminds me of women’s shoes based on my wife’s experience with them. They have half the leather and other materials as mine, yet somehow cost twice as much.
Dual core works fine for my Surface Pro for what I use that machine for, but I doubt you will be happy with it as your only laptop for what you appear to want to do with it.
Resist temptation
True and your dual core Surface is likely 15W not 5W These ULV CPU's are only good for basic productivity (owning a 2015 Retina MacBook with M5 CPU) Which I think is fair, what's not fair is Apple's price gouging. Why Apple has to be so amazingly greedy is beyond me. $1K USD would be a reasonable with a 256SSD for the new Air...
Microsoft's Surface Pro 6, i5 (8250U Quad Core) 8Gb RAM, 256SSD, with keyboard is $1360 having both Pen & Touch input, Apple's anaemic new Air with a matched 256 SSD is clearly a bargain at only $1400. One of these two can replace a desktop (light use), one of these two can re-role as tablet, one of these two has an SD card slot, one of these two has a OEM dock, one of these two has a keyboard design proven not to fail in time.
Franky both are very much sealed and non upgradable/repairable units. I know where my money will be going, I really like & enjoy the design language of the Air, my only ever problem with it was the cheap TN panel, equally purpose needs to be served. The new Surface Pro 6 to me offers so much more at a lower price point...
Q-6
Everyone is being really anti Apple here.
But consider this:
Now we at least know what Apple is doing with all those failed butterfly keyboards. When they fail, entire top shell needs to be replaced. So they used all that aluminium and plastic and created Macbook Air.
If you look at it that way, new Air is created almost out of thin air
Everyone is being really anti Apple here.
But consider this:
Now we at least know what Apple is doing with all those failed butterfly keyboards. When they fail, entire top shell needs to be replaced. So they used all that aluminium and plastic and created Macbook Air.
If you look at it that way, new Air is created almost out of thin air
I think they fully believe that they've solved the issue of the failed keyboards. I do believe the keyboard condom has fixed much of the failures, but I think overall the design is lacking. I've said this many times, I am happy with my MBP, but the keyboard is one area that I'm concerned about.all those failed butterfly keyboards
I think they fully believe that they've solved the issue of the failed keyboards. I do believe the keyboard condom has fixed much of the failures, but I think overall the design is lacking. I've said this many times, I am happy with my MBP, but the keyboard is one area that I'm concerned about.
What is probably even more surprising is that they added the T2 chip to other mac models, but NOT the touchbar. I think after two years and a lack of embrace by apple, its a gimmick that failed to catch on and apple will be discontinuing it after the next revision.
People are nervous about the T2 causing KPs in the Mini and MBA, so I think that's just as big of an issue as the keyboard
I think they fully believe that they've solved the issue of the failed keyboards.
Perhaps more interesting would be if the MBA and Mini have no KP issues, while the iMP and MBP continue to. That would leave me to believe that rather than admitting an issue with past T2 chips, that Apple has instead silently updated the T2 chip to resolve a hardware issue.
The question is how many are failing. I'm not marginalizing the issue but rather Apple feels that the keyboard is worth the occasional failure, so much so they have now fully embraced it, with all laptops they sell having the butterfly keyboard. It doesn't make sense for a company to roll out a product that will in the end cost them more money, so I think they're counting on the failure rates being low.If keyboards are still failing, and judging by the posts on this forum - they are, I doubt it that Apple isn't aware. They are a business after all, and this thing is eating their profits.
The question is how many are failing. I'm not marginalizing the issue but rather Apple feels that the keyboard is worth the occasional failure, so much so they have now fully embraced it, with all laptops they sell having the butterfly keyboard. It doesn't make sense for a company to roll out a product that will in the end cost them more money, so I think they're counting on the failure rates being low.
I will be perfectly honest and that some of the recent posts of the 18 keyboard failing has given me pause. If that happens to mine, I'll get it repaired and then turn around and sell it.
This is where I'm at. I really believe that apple has complete faith in the butterfly keyboard otherwise they would not have used it in the MBA. I do think because apple included it, the 3rd gen butterfly keyboard is better and should be ok. Still, my faith has been shakenso I am not sure at what percentage point failures become no longer profitable.
This is where I'm at. I really believe that apple has complete faith in the butterfly keyboard otherwise they would not have used it in the MBA. I do think because apple included it, the 3rd gen butterfly keyboard is better and should be ok. Still, my faith has been shaken