No kidding.
I would be upset if they changed but the blow might be lessened if it was a really unique/cool design
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How long before the watch gets a camera?
- Thread starter Endorphine88
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I would be upset if they changed but the blow might be lessened if it was a really unique/cool design
The only thing I wouldn’t mind them changing the band design for is if it was health related and allowed things like smart bands that I would get behind. I’m in the market for a new Apple Watch this year I’ve been thinking about what they could do this year as a stand out feature, last year had LTE for example and the only thing that springs to mind is health related.
And this reaction is hysterical to me. When technology companies offer something people don’t want, a ton of money is lost and it’s always considered a failure.
Fully functional flexible displays have been shown off at CES since 2006 and Samsung has been hyping it since 2011.
"Do you follow the timeline?" you ask.
Have you paid any attention to the smartwatch industry so far? I mean, have you really taken note of which ones succeeded and which ones are in the graveyard?
But I also question if there is actually a need for a camera on a smart watch. I’m not necessarily against having the functionality of a camera on a smart watch, but I think the Apple Watch has a much different focus which contributes to the success with the health related aspects and the watchOS integration with the iPhone. I just think the Apple Watch with a camera is an unnecessary feature , but again, I understand everything appeals to everybody differently. I just don’t think Apple shares your views on implementing a camera.
Just to be clear - I have NO VIEWS on adding a camera. I could care less. I just think that eventually there will be a need to incorporate more and more functionality into the watch or a device like it. I've also watched way too many sci-fi movies where someone is able to control stuff/communicate with people and do all sorts of crap from a watch-like device on their wrist. I just think it'd be cool if we live to see something like that. I certainly never thought I'd be able to leave my phone at home and stream music/text/take and make calls from my watch but that day came so I think the sky is the limit when it comes to tech
"Smart watch" is a marketing tag for what is the new "iPhone" being delivered to the market in iterative development. Yeah it will need a camera, once the phone/data radio has been fully established as standalone and primary more. Same as you need a camera on your iPhone.
But as stated, battery life and viewing/display capabilities need to be solved before you have a real standalone device that needs a camera.
"The sky" has nothing to do with it.
The watch lives on the wrist. It's more convenient -- you don't have to hold it in your hand -- but it's less versatile, too, because you can't aim it easily, nor can you use it very well after setting it down somewhere besides your wrist.
When we FaceTime with my dad, he usually puts his phone on the table and props it up against a book. He can't do that with a watch if it's on his wrist; and if he were able to take off the watch and still video chat with it, it'd too small to be worth looking at.
You can "do all sorts of crap" from today's smartwatches already, in case you haven't noticed. You can change the lights in your house, set schedule reminders, create and check off grocery lists, read the news, screen your emails, check local weather radar, play little games, log your sleep patterns.... oh yeah, and MAKE PHONE CALLS.
(seriously: before you post again, you need to sit there with your forearm at face height for ten minutes as if you were having a video chat conversation on your watch. Do it. Then tell us how great you think it'll be to do for real.)
What’s hysterical about people thinking a camera attached to your wrist isn’t very useful and could be seen as a privacy issue?
It has been done by others but Apple Watch is still the go to smart watch.
It's not really what you beileve, but more like what you want.
It never ceases to amaze me how close minded people is:
"It doesn't have a keyboard"
Nobody is having a 30min conversation using a watch in their home. The idea is more like to answer a 2min call when walking on the street. Like:
*incoming call*
-Where are you dave? you were supposed to be here 10 minutes ago
-I'll be there in a minute
*call ended*
Last edited:
Which doesn’t require a video camera.
I don’t think you understand what being “close-minded” means.
Nearly all of the responses to the OP’s question were reasonable, well-thought out, valid explanations for why a FaceTime camera on the WATCH is impractical.
Neither is a Smart watch really needed for the type of tasks it does, yet here we are...
[doublepost=1520571277][/doublepost]
"I don’t think you understand what being “close-minded” means." I think it's the other way around. All the responses categorically reject the idea. You're not opened to new things or things you've not experienced. You don't even give it a chance. "Impractical" were touchscreen keyboards. I'm pretty sure if a question about an all screen phone was asked 12 years ago, the responses would be in a similar fashion.
Thank god there are many companies who are willing to try new ideas, especially Apple.
Last edited:
I hadn't seen this before-- what a train wreck of an ad... It's been like 15 minutes since I've watched it and my skin is still crawling...
You haven’t been paying attention.
Cameras in watches have been tried. Several times, in fact. I gave examples, too. Guess what: they’re all dead and buried.
“We” on this forum haven’t had to reject them. The manufacturers and the open market already have done the rejecting.
Onscreen keyboards are a false equivalent. They’re simpler to manufacture (literally zero moving parts), easier to reconfigure through software (have you realized how many different keyboard layouts you have available?), and disappear when an app doesn’t need them.
A camera does not make a wristwatch better.
What Apple Watch version had a camera? because we're talking about Apple. They were already touch screen phones and touch screen computers, many in fact, before the iPhone and iPad.
If we go by what other companies have tried, we would have no iPhone today because touch screen phones were very bad at the time.
And you know all of this because Apple has successfully done it. In fact, those words are very similar to Jobs' words. Had he not introduced the iPhone, everyone would be defending their blackberries, how their keyboards were superior, etc, as you were doing when the iPhone was first introduced.
How do you know a camera on an Apple device, integrated to its ecosystem is a gimmick if you have never used it?
Because all the reasons camera-equipped watches already failed have nothing to do with software, wattage demands, or processing power, and everything to do with the notion of a wrist-mounted camera.
Go back through my posts in this thread and tell me one instance where I faulted the hardware or software of other smartwatch cameras.
Tell me when I said that their photo resolution wasn’t up to par, or the UI was clunky, or the screen wasn’t responsive, or the battery life sucked, or they were ugly.
These factors are what Apple improved upon with the iPhone (well, apart from battery life, but hey...).
But none of them can help a smartwatch camera become anything more than a stupid idea.
Oh, and this snarky little snipe:
Really? You weren’t there when I tried my coworker’s brand-new first-gen iPhone, and then turned to my little Blackberry Pearl and knew I would get rid of it within a year.
Really? You weren’t there when I tried my coworker’s brand-new first-gen iPhone, and then turned to my little Blackberry Pearl and knew I would get rid of it within a year.
Sure they can. If there's a good integration both in the device and with other services it can be a very good idea. But we'll never know if you keep rejecting the idea of innovation.
Oh-oh! This is exactly what I meant. You weren't sold until you tried it yourself. How can you absolutely reject the idea if you haven't tried it on an Apple watch with apps dedicated to the camera, with facetime integration, the Apple way, Not a lame samsumg after thought.
On top of that, Apple almost never implement a new technology first, unless it is their proprietary technology.
I don’t need to FaceTime with my mom through my watch. But I may need to call her in case of emergency. That’s why LTE watch is more practical than camera in watch in the near future.