Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How long till DSLR cameras shoot 2k or even 4k video?
- Thread starter waloshin
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Probably will take the same amount of time that it takes for mainstream display makers to begin selling affordable 4k monitors and tv sets..
Probably will take the same amount of time that it takes for mainstream display makers to begin selling affordable 4k monitors and tv sets..
Yeah that is what I was thinking.
It's not that DSLRs can't recored that resolution but its the data rate of 30fps or 60ifps of a frame of that size. Which is why the 2& 4k red and phantom cameras basically have a server of SATA drives or bank of SSDs attached to them. As soon as they have a form of media that is 1. large enough to handle any amount of video at the compact size for a DSLR 2. to be able to transfer at 300+mbps
Agreed for the average user 2k and 4k video is out of reach for the DSLR videographer market. Hell just the standard broadcast cameras DSLRs compete with are around 5-10k in the lower end market for 1080i broadcast quality video.
Don't know where you are buying your cameras from but I can pick up a Scarlet for a 1/4 of the price your price!
On topic, I think that I would prefer that the DSLRs would have a true 1080p resolution instead of the 800 lines ish they are resolving at the moment.
I would just be happy with a 4k monitor, so we could go retina with our desktops.. and realistically - dslr cameras as we know them will probably be obsolete before this feature is added some day to a mirrorless variety of camera which relies on retina optics for viewfinder.
Which will be pretty cool, I guess.. as long as the evf is realtime and does not black out for shutter release...
Which will be pretty cool, I guess.. as long as the evf is realtime and does not black out for shutter release...