These are iPad 3 camera specs, not iPad 2.I guess the front would be 0.8MP or so and the back maybe 3 to 5MP. The next question how much RAM does this thing have?
Those specs are really disappointing but no one will really take pictures with the iPad. You'll use the iPhone 5 to do that.
I'm so with you on this one.I hate this response. What if you dont have an iPhone. What if you want to create iMovies and rely on the iPad camera to natively capture photos and video? What if you want to output to a 1080p television? What if you want to scan QR's or barcodes? What if you want to take advantage of In-App Check Cashing but can't because the iPad 2 lacks Auto-Focus?
People use the camera for much more than pictures and there are many iPhone 4 Apps that CANT be ported because of an iPad 2 hardware problem that can only be solved buy buying an iPad 3 next year.
If it does then that's good news because scanning apps will still work. But I believe what it has isn't Touch to Auto-Focus but rather Touch Auto-Exposure similar to the iPod Touch. You tap the screen and it evaluates lighting in order to optimize the photo... but then it records a terribly grainy shot.iPad 2 does have auto-focus actually. I forget which site I read it at now, it was either Engadget or possibly here. They said it supports the same touch to focus gestures.
It was never mentioned. But it don't really matter, the average person don't care about megapixels according to many here. Does it work? That's all you need to know.![]()
If your average joe goes into a store and sees a 5mp and a 10mp compact camera, they buy the 10mp model as it's better. That's all they understand. They don't think about lens quality, only megapixels.
That's what reviewers have been moaning about. more megapixels sells your camera to the general consumer.
Now people are trying to turn this 180 degrees around and say the average consumer does not care about megapixels.