Right, I know that USB 2.0 is much slower than advertised, 480 MBit is the theoretical speed. But USB 3.0 is still ten times faster, so even after protocol overhead you will still have around 400 Megabytes/sec, compared to 30-40 for USB 2.0 and 60-70 for Firewire 800. Plus, it's full duplex. So even if Firewire has less overhead, the new Firewire 3200 will not be able to match USB 3.0. I think USB 3.0 will do to eSATA and Firewire what Intel Core2Duo did to G5 and AMD.
http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2007/12/battle-of-the-next-gen-firewire-s3200-vs-usb-3.ars
"Maximum theoretical data throughput will definitely be a point of contention between the two standards. Intel has stated that it expects USB 3.0 to be 10 times as fast as USB 2.0, which would give it a 4.8Gbps transfer rate. In contrast, the current iteration of S3200 will top out at 3.2Gbps. It's impossible to predict how much the throughput difference between the two standards will impact real-world device performance, but it's definitely a marketing edge that USB 3.0 proponents will lean on."
Firewire has always come closer to its specs in real world so while USB3 may be marginally faster its not going to be a lot faster. Much like the difference between FW400 and USB2.
"FireWire isn't just going to go away, however—it's currently included on a number of set-top cable boxes and is deployed in certain military situations. But that doesn't mean a new specification will trigger a fresh wave of peripherals, either. The peripheral interconnect market is already crowded; USB 2 is already popular, and eSATA support is growing. Combine this with the inevitable swarm of USB 3.0 products, and S3200 may end up buried, save for its continued presence and popularity in the market niches where FireWire has already established itself."
Apple will probably keep a single FW3200 plug on the MBPs and do USB3 only on the MBs.
With 400 MB/s you will almost be able to use a Flash drive as a poor man's RAM expansion. The "ReadyBoost" feature in Windows, which lets you use a Flash drive as a kind of virtual memory swap file, will be lightning fast... just plug in a 32 GB USB 3.0 flash drive and assign it to ReadyBoost and you've almost built your own SSD for a few bucks...
"ReadyBoost requirements
* 2.5 MB/sec throughout for 4 KB random reads
* 1.75 MB/sec throughout for 512 KB random writes"
That means that FW3200, if it delivers even 3.0Mbs will be fast enough for ReadyBoost. So FW3200 should be fine for swap drives provided you can find a platter drive that doesn't bottleneck it. The first devices using USB3 are going to cost more than just a few bucks due to the early adopter tax, but USB3 is more suited to ReadyBoost.
I don't think it will take several years. USB 3.0 ports will start showing up on computers around the time that Arrandale, Snow Leopard and Windows 7 is out, and USB 3.0 devices will start showing up in 2010.
"Hardware partners are expected to have USB 3.0 controllers designed by mid 2009, and consumers won't see the first end products utilizing the spec until early 2010 (though a late Holiday 2009 push for new products isn't out of the question)."
That still boils down to at least a year for anything beyond the first out of the box laptop, which you may not like anyway. Which means that the OSes will be out half a year before you might find a laptop you like.
No, USB 3.0 B plugs do not fit USB 2.0 sockets, but USB 3.0 sockets are backwards compatible so you can plug in 1.0 and 2.0 devices.
If a 3 socket fits a 2 plug, then a 2 socket can fit a 3 plug.
http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/everything_you_need_know_about_usb_30_plus_first_spliced_cable_photos
"Like the upgrade from USB 1.1 to 2.0, the new 3.0 connectors and cables will be physically and functionally compatible with hardware from the older specs."
"...you won’t be able to maximize your bandwidth unless you’re using a USB 3.0 cable with Superspeed devices and ports, but at least plugging a 3.0 cable into a 2.0 port won’t blow up your PC..."
Yes they do.