Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How pathetic is Anna Nicole Smith?
- Thread starter Thomas Veil
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Thomas Veil said:
Maybe she is a loser, maybe not. I don't care one way or the other. I get no satisfaction from watching someone else fail, and she and her "celebrity" do not interest me int he slightest. And All I know is this, she's got a lot more money than you or me, she's got some loyal friends, a loving son (I think) so I think she's doing all right.
I think its better to feel sorry for someone who seems to have substance abuse problems, rather than call them losers. its a failing, and it does not define the sum total of who she, or anyone else, is as a person.
Thomas Veil said:
It is very sad to hear of someone having problems like that. I hope that if she is having problems that she will seek help. At least a friend that might intervene on her behalf for the sake of her son. I'm sure that her life isn't an easy one.
Don't you mean a 'thread' dedicated to Anna Nicole Smith? I bet you will find a lot more references to 'Kiera' than Anna Nicole in this 'forum' . . .aricher said:
Heh. I saw her on an interview show several years ago, and at first I thought I was being put on, that she was playing the "dumb blonde" role that well.MacNut said:
But to see her again is to realize that, oh my God, she really is that dumb. The woman has the intellectual depth of a slice of lunch meat.
It is pathetic, because she's obviously gifted, beauty-wise, and she seems to have a playful nature. But for God's sake, get an education, woman, before you open your mouth again!
If she were smarter, she probably wouldn't feel the need to smoke whatever the heck she's been smokin'.
Not exactly a good advertisement for the Texas school system.
AnewMac said:
Here's a small real-video (sorry) clip.
http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/real/ram/0,3256,kam_anna_nicole_ama,00.ram
snowdog said:
Not really related to the topic, but how do you get those clips ending in .ram to play ?... I just assumed they didn't work on macs...
Thomas Veil said:
Why is someone a loser just because they're stoned? Just because someone told you smoking marijuana is bad? Do you have any prooof? Would they be a loser if they stood on stage smoking a cigerette? Which has more chemicals that harm your body? Which would have a bigger lobby in congress to ensure favorable laws are passed toward one substance, and slander towards the other?
I don't understand. They're both a leafed substance. One they pump hundreds of chemicals into that get you high, the other gets you high naturally. One invests billions of dollars through lobbies, the other does not.
I thought we liked natural things and disliked chemicals. I'm confused.
When has anybody ever appeared on TV spaced out and made a fool of themselves because of a cigarette?
sgarringer said:
Btw, you are 'mostly' wrong. The pot on the streets these days isnt THAT natural. They add a lot of crap to it. Of course, if its home grown its all good, but most of the stuff that is sold onthe streets/schools, isnt.
Last time I smoked pot, I only took ONE shot and I was gone for the rest of the night. Before that, I would be tired of smoking before feeling anything more than a small buzz. I was so ****ed up that I swore to never smoke that crap again, I havent and dont plan too.
When you dont know exactly what you have in hands, you better just pass on.
Mantat said:
Thats not true. What do they mix with it? Have you ever thought that maybe growing methods have improved over the years?
Your correct, pot today is different than pot 20 years ago. Its grown in greenhouses, grow rooms, under strictly controled light, water, fertalizer and wind. Its then precisely dried and comacted. Pot 20 years ago was grown behind someones barn or in a field or in the woods somewhere.
Just compare hydroponic tomatoes to vine-ripened tomatos at a grocery store someday. You'll notice a little difference I'm sure.
I feel it necessary to say that I'm not advocating anyone go out and smoke pot. Its illegal. I certinaly believe this is wrong, but while its illegal, its certainly a bad idea to go out and do it.
Does anybody else think that she WASN'T messed up, but just doing it all for the attention, i.e. playing the part??
MacDawg said:
Bingo. I'm with you on that one. She was a little too stable for her speech patterns, and her movements looked a little TOO sure.
MattG said:See my above post where I called her an "attention whore."
But she could have been an attention whore by getting drunk, stoned knowing she was going on TV. I don't think she was. I think it was a cold, calculated marketing strategy.
Have you ever seen this girl on tv. This is her normal way to acting/talking... She is prety messed up and I have no mercy for her. Look at her bio and you will see how she ended up like that. She wanted money to the point of wedding an old (as in going to die next week) billionaire and did other crap of her own will. She trully deserve to be treated the way she is now: as a clown.
ok...she was out of it, on national TV watched by millions.
It may have been booze, grass, coke, etc etc. Non of our business I say, its her life and if she wants to project the impression that shes a cretin, fair enough...her choice I say. Pathetic is probably too strong a word I'd say.
It may have been booze, grass, coke, etc etc. Non of our business I say, its her life and if she wants to project the impression that shes a cretin, fair enough...her choice I say. Pathetic is probably too strong a word I'd say.