There is no safety net with drag and drop, if you accidentally release the mouse button you could lose your files in amongst files in another directory.
I've done that often, using Windows, rarely using Mac OS.
There is no safety net with drag and drop, if you accidentally release the mouse button you could lose your files in amongst files in another directory.
In fact, it sometimes requires less effort to move a file than copy it because it can often just update file system references instead of copying any data!
I actually sometimes still use Windows... just so that I can move and organise my file systems. It's essentially impossible using the drag and drop of Finder.
There is no safety net with drag and drop, if you accidentally release the mouse button you could lose your files in amongst files in another directory.
You and everyone else in the "whaa whaa Apple should do this" camp choose to come here ("here" as in "a site not affiliated with Apple") and vent your frustrations. The proper channel for giving feedback to Apple is via their feedback page.
Statements like this
...just confirm that you don't really get it.
I think the killer thing here that nobody seems to have said is that if the feature was implemented, what would be the problem? If you wouldn't use it, good for you, but why don't users get the choice? Surely the fact there are apps out there for $40 bucks a pop, illustrate that there is a large enough market for this?
We are not here to force people to use copy and paste features, but they are here to force us to accept the lack of copy and paste. Quite ridiculous, really.
Those against the suggestions are not upset about the implementation of a feature that they won't use and one which won't affect them. They are upset that new Apple users (i.e. Windows and Linux users) want new features. It's an inability to accept positive criticisms and suggestions and the overall haughty attitude and narrow mindedness that is causing the arguments...Quite ridiculous, really.