I agree that people, in general, should be warned if there's a reason to believe they're unaware that they're breaking the rules (and we do warn people, often), and I agree that we sometimes ban people erroneously. But we've usually warned those people in the past, and we usually know more about a situation than the general membership does - sometimes more than the members in question are aware that we know.
But, yes, mistakes are made, and there's a mechanism in place to deal with that, and, if used properly, it usually results in a quick solution to the problem.
As far as post edits go: we edit what we see or what's reported. There's no way we can follow every single post, so it's impossible for the exact same standards to be applied to every post, as we simply do not see every post.
Yeah, that wasn't meant as an accusation. All I was trying to say is that you guys have enough to do that you don't see everything and make mistakes. And I know from personal experience that you guys normally warn before something else, all I am saying is that should be standard. But I know as well as you that it won't be due to all of us only being human.