Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Reading from all the sources mentioned is one thing, more important is, as mentioned here before:

Ethics and history.

The political news in itself is pretty worthless, because of our "limited" life experience. So you have to find similar situations in the past and you have to build your own ethical standards, which likely puts you in a "political corner".

Politics has a huge influence on all peoples life, nowadays often on people somewhere else in the world.

I normaly try to imagine, what consequences a political decission has on people and, if it doesn't involve myself directly, I try to put myself mentaly into another persons position (the unemployed, the rich etc.). Questions like this:
"Is it just", "Does it help society", "What about the nature" and so on.. Think also of future generations.

That is a good start:

emac kinda guy said:
... Capitalism won! ...

If there's a winner, there must be a looser, too. Who is the looser? What happened to him? Am I (or people around you) on the winner or the looser site? What does the other side look like? If there's is another "fight" coming up, is "capitalism" to win again? What does "capitalism" actually mean?...

So you just look for questions and answers.

In the news, you look for those questions and you should be able to find the answers (internet is a great medium to find answers). You also might feel better, if you adjust your lifestyle according to your "ethics": Some people stop eating meat, start community services... others might think it's worth to kill and to be killed defending their nation or principles.
 
Thanks for the props, aquajet.

Here are a few other pointers I thought of:

Brush up on the Constitution. Then compare what any politician says -- particularly if they are trying to justify controversial actions -- with what the Constitution says and the courts' interpretation of it throughout history.

I mentioned that you should avoid Bill O'Reilly. I forgot to add that he presents himself as a straight-forward, "no-spin" observer. Don't you believe it. People have caught him in a number of lies, which he sometimes continues to tell in spite of having been caught. So although he portrays himself as a no-nonsense, truthful guy, he actually has no problems with distorting the truth. I mention this not because I agree or disagree with O'Reilly's views, but because I hate it when people characterize themselves as objective and "above the fray" when they're really deep down in it.

Finally, Bill Clinton actually offered some good advice. The loudest, angriest talk show hosts and TV pundits constantly take complex issues and try to reduce them to terms of black or white. Similarly, they portray their political opponents in simplistic, stereotypical ways. In reality, few people are as two-dimensional as cartoon characters, and issues don't always have easy solutions. Keep that in mind when highly-opinionated political pundits try to tell you, for example, that Bush is a complete moron or that taxes are inherently bad.
 
irain said:
Hi, I'm 14, almost 15. I've been finding myself wanting to get into the know how of politics lately. I would love to be able to discuss politics with adults. The only problem is that I don't know how to being learning about whats going on in today's day and age.
Should I start watching CNN? Reading articles online? What?

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

First, and by far most important, have a good long hard think about what your values are and what kind of world you think we should be living in. This may seem daunting and will take you a while – encompassing elements of ethics, morals, human nature and all sorts of other lines of thought. However, it is essential if you are to have any semblance of an ‘independent’ critique on political and social issues that reflects your true feelings and beliefs as opposed to merely regurgitating adopted opinions.

The good news is that, as well as being essential, you’ll also find it engrossing, fascinating, thought provoking and liberating. You have already overcome the biggest hurdle that most people never get to – actually having an interest in the issues that make a difference to people’s lives. For something almost everyone has an opinion on, not many people are actually that interested in politics – and certainly not that many 14 year olds.

As a good grounding you might want to start by reading some introductory books on political and social philosophy to get a feel for what you agree with and what you don’t. Before this though, as mentioned above, have a good think for yourself – philosophy is always much more rewarding when you see some of your own ideas, opinions and leanings cropping up and being discussed/challenged/affirmed by some of the world’s greatest thinkers.

As far as newspapers go, by all means read as much as you want, but take all of it with a pinch of salt. As businesses, newspapers’ primary function is no to report the facts – it’s to make money. This has nothing to do with the money they make from people buying their newspaper – they make their money from selling advertising space to companies. Essentially, the larger the circulation, the more a newspaper can charge companies to advertise in its pages. It may not seem like it, but this can also (and does, massively) effect the news stories that a paper chooses and chooses not to print. I could go on and on for a while about the intricacies of all this but suffice to say, don’t believe everything you read – articles that get printed (as with the ones that get left out) are selected for a reason – a reason which is, in itself, highly political. If you’re searching for something close to the truth (whatever that might be) with regards to anything from the Israeli/Palestinian conflict to general election coverage, you won’t find it on CNN or in the pages of The New York Times.

For a good example of how ‘selective’ the media can be I would highly recommend reading Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky. It’s dense and can seem a little over-comprehensive, but it provides an excellent in-depth critique of the corporate-owned media and its inherent biases.
 
Politics can be interesting and fascinating. Know your history for background, as well as taking in current events.

My favorite and most dependable sources for information are (in no particular order):

the new york times (nytimes.com - left-leaning)
the washington post (washingtonpost.com - centrist)
npr.org (the dian rehm show in particular has a great round-table discussion that covers both sides, centrist IMO)
c-span (i can't believe no one's mentioned this yet, neither left or right, plays back speeches from both (that you might not otherwise hear) as well as recordings from other political shows.)
the economist (right-leaning, very intelligent and you get a healthy dose of world affairs)

I try to stay away from television, too sensationalist and ridiculous most of the time and it never goes too much in depth in an intelligent way. If I ever do, I only watch meet the press.

I also try to stay away from blogs. Are these people professional journalists??? Nope.

Op/Ed pieces can be interesting and can be good for food for thought. But, like everything else, take it with a grain of salt.

(As an aside, whether or not you're conservative, please don't watch Fox News. They are often factually wrong, and are very manipulative. There are more intelligent sources to get the conservative perspective.)

You'll get the hang of it after a while. I found it especially helpful to do some research on the structure of our government and the general schedule of how/when certain things happen.

And, whether you're left- or right-leaning, if you find yourself getting too emotional about a topic (pretty common here in DC), giving too much praise or criticism, check yourself. It's always good to realize that both sides can have good ideas.

Oh, and please don't become one of those only-votes-based-on-one-topic people. They tend to shut out everything else, aren't very informed as a whole, and tend to be taken advantage of.

Good luck with it all, and scrutnize everything you hear/see/read, whether you agree with it or not.

DCBASS
 
DCBass said:
the washington post (washingtonpost.com - centrist)

Ahem...no comment ;)

DCBass said:
c-span (i can't believe no one's mentioned this yet, neither left or right, plays back speeches from both (that you might not otherwise hear) as well as recordings from other political shows.)

Good point. A representative from C-Span lectured in my Mass Media class a few semesters ago, and provided some interesting insight into the inner workings of C-Span. I chuckled at his comment -- C-Span is the only true reality television.
 
In my experience everyone has an axe to grind and I have yet to see anyone straight down the middle. Fox News tried but overshot to the right. Most others push left. Its the nature of the beast. Journalism has become entertainment and emotional issues are better entertainment and the more liberal side of issues tend to be more emotionally sellable. (Its so much easier to side with a 16 year old honor student dead of septicemia from a back alley abortion than it is to side with a peanut sized person)

Everyone has an axe to grind. Learn to see when people grind their axes.

As for the best way to learn about it. Volunteer. Find a candidate who you agree with. Someone at the state and local level and help out with their campaign. Stuff envelopes, etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.