Right, until then we can't say "You should have known better and gone with SS."
I can say that. This guy is obviously over the top concerned with a single scratch, so common sense says he should have bought the more scratch resistant product.
Right, until then we can't say "You should have known better and gone with SS."
....but the oleophobic coating is NOT more scratch resistant on the SS than on the Sport. Scratching of the oleophobic coating will be the same.I can say that. This guy is obviously over the top concerned with a single scratch, so common sense says he should have bought the more scratch resistant product.
....but the oleophobic coating is NOT more scratch resistant on the SS than on the Sport. Scratching of the oleophobic coating will be the same.
That said, I don't know that the oleophobic coating is or isn't more scratch resistant on the two watch display surfaces, and aren't going to draw a conclusion based on a forum post. The fact that Apple has a patent specifically for oleophobic coating on sapphire would imply that it is different, and therefore could be more or less scratch resistant.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14...-displays-with-patent-for-oleophobic-coatings So unless you are an Apple engineer that knows the facts here, this is all speculation. Apple advertises the sapphire watch crystal as being more scratch resistant, so I will take them at their word for that.
The fact that a number of SS owners have reported getting scratches within the oleophobic coating on the sapphire crystal disputes that it might be more scratch resistant.
My point was simply that if the OP is this concerned about a single scratch, he might have wanted to buy the more scratch resistant watch.
Have you ever used an iPhone or iPad that was a year or more old? If so it's oleophobic coating would be most likely worn off.
Also you can use isopropyl alcohol to remove it.
Awesome, I'll give it a shot then. Thanks man
I would suggest googling that a bit before doing it. There is benefit to the coating or they wouldn't have put it on there. Introducing a harsh cleaning agent that will remove it entirely will have a lasting impact on use of the device. I have never used anything but a damp soft cloth to clean any of my smartphone displays, so I HIGHLY doubt that just because they are a few years old, the coating is gone. Not sure you are getting the best advise here on that one.
I usually remove it from my iDevices. While it does make cleaning easer I find it can be too reflective in sunlight and fingerprints tend to bead up and show more. However I have left it on my current iPhone andAwesome, I'll give it a shot then. Thanks man
Right, until then we can't say "You should have known better and gone with SS."
If the scratch is within the oleophobic coating then that's not indicative of a weaker quality. Traditional watches do not have this coating as there's no reason to touch their screens. As someone mentioned, this coating (along with any scratches) can be removed entirely and a number of members have done this. The SS models also have it so it'd be no different.