Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

How would you order?

A

ATLapplefan

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Mar 11, 2015
4
0
I've decided I'm going to update my setup from a 2010 mbp to the new 2015 13 inch rmbp. However, I want to keep my budget under 2k but get the best performance. Which option would you choose? (Prices are based on student discount)

Option 1:
2.9 ghz i5
16 gb ram
512 gb storage
Price: 1,879

Option 2:
3.1 ghz i7
16 gb ram
256 gb storage
Price: 1,759

Basically due to apple over-pricing storage, I either get a higher processor or go with larger storage. Now I'm not a storage hog however I due wish to keep this setup for another 5 years or so. Is there a performance benefit to storage such as different r/w speeds or all are the same? Would the higher processor make a difference? Any opinions would be appreciated.
 
ATLapplefan said:
Is there a performance benefit to storage such as different r/w speeds or all are the same? Would the higher processor make a difference? Any opinions would be appreciated.
Click to expand...

The only long-term performance difference between these two would be the processor and it is very little. The greater storage will benefit you more down the road than a small bump in cpu.
 
Personally, I'd go with option #2 because I'm positive I won't be needing the entire 256GB (even over several years). However, if you're on the edge (even a little bit), go with option #1.
 
Last edited:
ATLapplefan said:
I've decided I'm going to update my setup from a 2010 mbp to the new 2015 13 inch rmbp. However, I want to keep my budget under 2k but get the best performance. Which option would you choose? (Prices are based on student discount)

Option 1:
2.9 ghz i5
16 gb ram
512 gb storage
Price: 1,879

Option 2:
3.1 ghz i7
16 gb ram
256 gb storage
Price: 1,759

Basically due to apple over-pricing storage, I either get a higher processor or go with larger storage. Now I'm not a storage hog however I due wish to keep this setup for another 5 years or so. Is there a performance benefit to storage such as different r/w speeds or all are the same? Would the higher processor make a difference? Any opinions would be appreciated.
Click to expand...

First, do you really need 16GB RAM?

I'd say the sweet spot would be 2.7/8/256.

Apple updated the SSDs to 4 lanes across all capacities. Not sure whether they still use a mishmash of Toshiba, SanDisk and Samsung or not.

Samsung drives tend to be faster and perform almost equally at 256GB and above.
 
Option 1.

FWIW, the SSDs in it are new. So, it's still too early to say if the larger ones will have better performance or not. It would be nothing more than an assumption at this point to say larger = faster.

If you really want an answer to that question, I would wait until some sites have reviewed the new systems and done their benchmarks on the different sizes.
 
I'd go option 1 all day. The processor will be barely noticeable if you don't do a ton of CPU-intensive stuff. Not fully upgrading the ram is silly if you're trying to keep it 5+ years, so 16 gb is a good idea. I don't know how anyone makes do with less than 500 gb of storage these days, believe me you'll thank yourself for that down the road. You won't even notice or care if you went with the slightly faster processor.

Option 1 by far.
 
No brainer to go with Option 2. Better processor and higher resale value for when you decide to get rid of it 2 or 3 years down the line for newer model. The storage isn't a problem as you can store pictures, videos, etc on external. The core applications can be installed on SSD.

Again, Option 2 is a no brainer in this case.
 
Honestly, on a budget, 2.9+256GB, and put the other $200 either into AppleCare or some nice peripheral.

But of the two posted, I'd go 2.9+512GB. You're talking double storage vs. a 7% increase in CPU clock. Both the i5 and the i7 are hyperthreaded, so the only advantage to the architecture is the bigger L3 cache, and it's really not that big of a deal for most applications.

And since neither is going to game worth a damn past basic stuff on an Iris 6100, there's really just not a ton of point in spending the extra for that little performance gain. It is resale value, but not $200 more resale value.

The one counterargument I'd make is that you can buy external drives, but you can't buy external CPUs.

As far as the drive space goes, my 256GB work laptop is still only maybe 2/3 full after two years, and that has VM images and all kinds of projects on it. If you're not installing a bunch of games or storing a bunch of movies you'd probably be OK at even the lower capacity.

But still, of the two, I'd put the money in the SSD. It's really the better bargain IMO.
 
geoelectric said:
Honestly, on a budget, 2.9+256GB, and put the other $200 either into AppleCare or some nice peripheral.

But of the two posted, I'd go 2.9+512GB. You're talking double storage vs. a 7% increase in CPU clock. Both the i5 and the i7 are hyperthreaded, so the only advantage to the architecture is the bigger L3 cache, and it's really not that big of a deal for most applications.

And since neither is going to game worth a damn past basic stuff on an Iris 6100, there's really just not a ton of point in spending the extra for that little performance gain. It is resale value, but not $200 more resale value.

The one counterargument I'd make is that you can buy external drives, but you can't buy external CPUs.

As far as the drive space goes, my 256GB work laptop is still only maybe 2/3 full after two years, and that has VM images and all kinds of projects on it. If you're not installing a bunch of games or storing a bunch of movies you'd probably be OK at even the lower capacity.

But still, of the two, I'd put the money in the SSD. It's really the better bargain IMO.
Click to expand...

I think he can pick up AppleCare on Amazon for less than what Apple charges. I saw one on there for $175. Might want to keep that in mind. Didn't do much research into it but I'm sure it'll work. Hopefully it helps with the OP's budget.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back