Hi guys,
Now my Mac Pro is shipped, I'm already thinking about how to tinker with it. 😀
My Raid solution is below, and since I've never played with Raid before, I wanted to know if this solution is sensible to achieve what I require, and what other people would suggest.
Bays 1 & 2 = 2 x 500gb WD RE2 500gb Drives with 16mb cache, set to Raid 0
<EDIT> Or more realistically, possibly 2 x Western Digital Caviar RE 250GB 2500YS SATA-II 16MB Cache
These will be the bootable drives, and also run aperture, and contain my aperture library.
Bay 3 = 1 x 500 gb drive = Storage drive, containing video etc, used as a samba share to stream to my hacked xbox downsairs. Also used for backing up aperture library, email, itunes library etc.
Bay 4 = 1 x ??? gb drive (not decided yet) Windows XP for playing games
External Firewire Caddy = Will be used to backup aperture, email, itunes library etc, for more redundancy.
Does that seem ok to you guys? or is there another way you'd do it?
I guess with the 2x500gb drives, I'd have 1tb storage on a raid 0...I really don't need that much, so I guess I could get away with smaller drives, but I still want fast performance...hmm...
Now my Mac Pro is shipped, I'm already thinking about how to tinker with it. 😀
My Raid solution is below, and since I've never played with Raid before, I wanted to know if this solution is sensible to achieve what I require, and what other people would suggest.
Bays 1 & 2 = 2 x 500gb WD RE2 500gb Drives with 16mb cache, set to Raid 0
<EDIT> Or more realistically, possibly 2 x Western Digital Caviar RE 250GB 2500YS SATA-II 16MB Cache
These will be the bootable drives, and also run aperture, and contain my aperture library.
Bay 3 = 1 x 500 gb drive = Storage drive, containing video etc, used as a samba share to stream to my hacked xbox downsairs. Also used for backing up aperture library, email, itunes library etc.
Bay 4 = 1 x ??? gb drive (not decided yet) Windows XP for playing games
External Firewire Caddy = Will be used to backup aperture, email, itunes library etc, for more redundancy.
Does that seem ok to you guys? or is there another way you'd do it?
I guess with the 2x500gb drives, I'd have 1tb storage on a raid 0...I really don't need that much, so I guess I could get away with smaller drives, but I still want fast performance...hmm...