Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
TheMac19 said:
Actually, i found the sizing of pictures printed through Windows XP hugely troubling, regardless of my intended size. I first noticed it when printing 4x6 boarderless photos on 4x6 glossy paper, the image filled the paper, but was cropped. For a snapshots here or there it might not matter, but it's a huge hinderance when doing exact work.
...
Best of luck either way! I agree, it'd be perfect if the 14" ibooks were widescreen. Hell, they'd all be widescreen if it were up to me. Although I can only imagine a 14' widescreen iBook would start to inch into the 15" powerbook sales pretty hard, especially with the superdrive...

Yes, if the iBooks were widescreen, I wouldn't have a quandry at all. 🙂

Trying to get 4x6 bordless prints without killing part of the image is impossible for many digital cameras. 4x6 is for 35mm (24mmx36mm) film. Expensive digital cameras using a similar aspect ratio can do it but they rarely end up as 4x6 prints. 😀 My Olympus E-1 has a 4:3 ratio so my 4x6 prints have nice handles so people don't put their fingers on the printed area.

I keep hoping that Apple gives us some upgraded display sizes. If not, I could just give up and buy the lowest cost iBook and be prepared to sell it next year, losing money. 🙄
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.