A "racist" webcam.HP looking into claim webcams can't see black people
By Mallory Simon, CNN
(CNN) -- Can Hewlett-Packard's motion-tracking webcams see black people? It's a question posed on a now-viral YouTube video and the company says it's looking into it.
In the video, two co-workers take turns in front of the camera -- the webcam appears to follow Wanda Zamen as she sways in front of the screen and stays still as Desi Cryer moves about.
HP acknowledged in a statement e-mailed to CNN that the cameras may have issues with contrast recognition in certain lighting situations.The webcams, built into HP's new computers, are supposed to keep people's faces and bodies in proportion and centered on the screen as they move.
The video went viral over the weekend, garnering more than 400,000 YouTube page views and a slew of comments on Twitter.
It was something neither Zamen nor Cryer expected to happen.
Zamen said she and Cryer, her co-worker, were playing around with the computer at work and testing it when they stumbled upon the facial recognition feature.
Cryer and Zamen said they were laughing when they realized the camera followed her and not him.
"We thought it was pretty funny, we thought it was hilarious," Zamen said.
So they made a video, which they planned to just share with friends on Facebook and YouTube. There was no script, no rehearsal, just two friends filming what they thought was a hilarious software glitch.
So again, the two took turns in front of the camera.
"As soon as my blackness enters the frame, it stopped," Cryer says in the video.
"Black Desi gets in there, no face recognition anymore, buddy," he says.
"I think my blackness is interfering with the computer's ability to follow me," he continues.
But now that the video has gotten so much attention, the two co-workers want everyone, including HP, to know they never intended the video to spark a discussion about whether the webcam was racist.
Zamen said she liked the computer so much, she suggested Cryer get one for his wife.
"The intent was definitely not to go after HP, it just so happened the computer was an HP and we recognized the software glitch," Cryer said.
"We did it for laughs, but if the video does make HP put out a better product, then great," Zamen added.
HP was quick to react, too.
The company quickly posted on the it's blog, TheNextBench.com, on Sunday after the video went viral, responding to concerns.
"The technology we use is built on standard algorithms that measure the difference in intensity of contrast between the eyes and the upper cheek and nose," wrote Tony Welch, the lead social media strategist for HP's Personal Systems Group. "We believe that the camera might have difficulty 'seeing' contrast in conditions where there is insufficient foreground lighting."
Of course, HP is right about contrast being the problem. The lower the camera's ability to see contrast -- and webcams usually rate pretty low in that regard -- the more it tends to have problems with darker-skinned people.
And you can actually have the same problem with white people. Just ask anyone who's ever tried to shoot video of someone standing in front of a window on a sunny day.
In fact, talking of background, I'd bet Cryer would have been "seen" by the camera better if the two of them had been standing against a darker background...say, a medium-to-dark blue or gray wall. The camera would've irised up a bit, enabling it to pick up more detail. As it is, it looks like the two of them are standing in front of not only a pale wall, but a fluorescent lighting fixture as well.
