So then what about the 6s coprocessor being called the M9?How about the fact they named their product A9 which is the name of the iPhone 6s processor. So it looks like it and had the same name as it. Coincidence?
So then what about the 6s coprocessor being called the M9?How about the fact they named their product A9 which is the name of the iPhone 6s processor. So it looks like it and had the same name as it. Coincidence?
In fact, the HTC One M7 came before the 5s. With that, HTC made the first ever all-aluminum phone. The 5/5s had glass covering the antennas, instead, HTC managed to use the plastic insulators to seperate the top/bottom band to make the metal the antenna. This antenna design was what Apple copied (along with the full-metal body!) in the iPhone 6, kudos to HTC. Before this, no one had made a full metal phone with no plastic/glass antenna covers.
If Apple wasn't copying HTC, why didn't they use the 4's antenna design make a full metal phone with the 5? or 5s? Quite simply, HTC were first.
HTC had two-generations of all-aluminum One's before the iPhone 6 came along. Apple ripping off this "truly revolutionary" design – as Apple would call it – is what you call shameful.
Yes, anyone who thinks any other company might have designed something without an Apple template is a fool. And when Apple adds notifications, or other design elements it's a magical innovation. Some of you guys are ridiculous.
I only use Apple stuff for computer/phones/whatever, and after using a Note 4 for a month, did not like Android and the lack of control they have over the carriers. But a superior product does not mean everyone else is copying, not innovating, etc. Surface vs iPad Pro and the Apple Pencil? Come on, guys. Competition and trying to refine and improve each others ideas is what will ultimately give us the best products. The whining and lawsuits should stop.
hasn't the 6s got a Co processor named M9.. coincidence...? see what I did there....How about the fact they named their product A9 which is the name of the iPhone 6s processor. So it looks like it and had the same name as it. Coincidence?
hasn't the 6s got a Co processor named M9.. coincidence...? see what I did there....
Uh, people...
-- HTC AND APPLE ARE CROSS-LICENSED:
A lot of posters here seem to have forgotten (or never knew) that Apple and HTC have a full utility patent cross-license. In other words, Apple and HTC have already agreed to the limits of what can be done.
The license specifies that HTC cannot look too much like an iPhone, so Apple has 30 days to file a complaint if they wish.
However, such a complaint is unlikely to happen, since the same cross license is what allowed Apple to use HTC's proprietary and first-of-its-kind full metal case antenna design, albeit with thicker lines so they wouldn't be copying HTC too closely.
-- THE OFT-MENTIONED LINES ARE NOT WHAT MOST PEOPLE THINK:
A lot of people also seem really confused about antenna "lines" and think that the iPhone 5 is somehow similar. Hardly! (Also see Anandtech quote below.)
The iPhone 5 used glass tops and bottoms to let its internal antennas get through. It was just like years of previous phones that used plastic or other RF transparent materials where the internal antennas are. Nothing special at all.
OTOH, the HTC One was the world's first all metal smartphone design where the metal tops and bottoms WERE the antennas, with a case that was seamlessly bonded out of metal and plastic. LATER on, the iPhone 6 also switched to using the metal top and bottom antenna design.
(No, the iPhone does not transmit through the plastic lines. The lines are insulators, not windows. Cellular doesn't work through tiny windows. That was something that had to be taught to Jon Ive as well, since he mistakenly thought that radios could go through metal or thin windows back when he first started designing the iPhone case. No doubt he was a big proponent of Apple using the HTC design later on.)
To quote Anandtech (when Anand was still there) back in 2013:
"Before you go and say that HTC copied Apple, remember that the reality of product development cycles means that HTC was well underway with the One around the time the 4S was out."
Great post. Sadly one of the very few intelligent (and correct) posts in this thread. Brand loyalty is indeed blind.
Looks like we are running out of phone designs.
i guess so,but i still wont stopWhat a juvenile thing to say.
The iPhone 6 copied the HTC one m7's design which came out a year and a half before the iPhone 6 !Didn't the iPhone 6 came out last year and that the iPhone 6S is based off the iPhone 6 HTC?
What are you talking about ? IPhone had the same look forever, but they didn't change their look to the iPhone 6 until after HTC had put out the one series the HTC one m7, and m8, all which have the all metal body, same Exact anetanna bands which the iPhone 6 copied , log slender body for easier one handed use which iPhone 6 copied , iPhone copied HTC's 5mp front facing camera, and even the zoe camera which iPhone 6s copeid ! The A9 looks just like all the other HTC phones, just thinner and it has a bottom speaker !! These are the only similarities of the iPhone 6!! The reason they resemble eachothwr isn't a bottom speaker, it's the metal body, the long slender shape, and antenna bands that the iPhone 6 copied off the HTC one series phones,high predate the iPhone 6 by atleast a year and a half !! WHAT THAT !! Apple copied someone... Nooo... I mean come on dude, Apple copies everything !! They copied face time, they copied the finger print scanner off Motorola, they even stole the technology for the A7, A8,& A9 chips Apple fanboys brag about so much !! This is why Apple's in court all the time !! When's the last time we've seen innovation from Apple ?? The only innovation Apple has these days is copied ideas and technology, that they have put an I in front of lolWhat? The iPhone 6 and 6s are visually identical.
The M7, M8, and M9 had their own design language. The A9 is nothing like the M series except that it's metal. The A9 is no longer rounded, has sharper edges, has the camera above the antenna lines, doesn't have the plastic "slit" between the camera and the bands, and the edges look exactly like an iPhone 6.