I left Hulu last year, but at the time they offered an ad-free version for a few dollars more a month - much better experience.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hulu Inks Exclusive Streaming Deal With Disney, Gains 50+ New Titles
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I left Hulu last year, but at the time they offered an ad-free version for a few dollars more a month - much better experience.
Hulu for movies is not great. I rarely watch any movies on Hulu, but the few times I browse for movie using the ATV4 Hulu app, the description is very lacking and there is not a place to see the actors.
Netflix on the ATV4 is almost as bad, but they still have a good description for the movies. It is a shame that Netflix did away with the actor info on the ATV4 app.
Both services are better on the ATV3 imo.
Between Netflix, Hulu they both have old movies. Why not offer new movies that's out the movie theater.
As of 2016, Netflix has first run cable/steaming rights for all Disney/Marvel/Pixar/Lucasfilms movies. They bought those rights when the prior deal expired with Starz who had it through 2015. THAT was a huge deal and costs Netflix hundreds of millions of dollars every year.
Hulu just got the rights to some films in the Disney catalog which really isn't especially notable and happens all the time across the various cable channels/streaming services.
If it's that big of a deal pay the $2 more on hulu and get the ad-free version. People love to attack Hulu but it is the most current, and I can watch NEW episodes of my favorite shows, ad in (lol) the ad free version and Hulu absolutely destroys Netflix in my opinion. Although it seems like you wouldn't want new content to be available because you'd have to be there.
I guess this is good for apple tv owners and the TV app since the TV doesn't have access to the netflix library that also contains Disney Movies.
[doublepost=1483047938][/doublepost]
Admittingly I am overpaying for a xfinity package, Hulu and Netflix.
I'd really like to cut the tv portion of my xfinity dependency and go with a $50 plan.
Even with hulu, netflix and a NBA/Sports package I think it'd still be below $100 vs my $140+ monthly package
Oh yeah an kodi to fill in all of the cracks.
[doublepost=1483047938][/doublepost]
Admittingly I am overpaying for a xfinity package, Hulu and Netflix.
I'd really like to cut the tv portion of my xfinity dependency and go with a $50 plan.
Even with hulu, netflix and a NBA/Sports package I think it'd still be below $100 vs my $140+ monthly package
Oh yeah an kodi to fill in all of the cracks.
Last edited:
Netflix already has Captain America Civil War, which is quite far from an "old movie".
Exactly. Per the new deal, Netflix gets EVERY Disney movie before any cable channel or competing streaming service. (Not counting rentals of course.)
You make a good point about the new content, and for you its probably a good solution. My experience with Hulu however is that you have to be actively engaged with it throughout the season. If I wait until the season is mostly over, heck sometimes only seven episodes in, to start watching something I have found the first few episodes are no longer available for streaming. If I can't watch the first three episodes of a season I'm not going to watch the rest. I personally can't watch TV for myself every week. I just don't have enough personal time. I might get a chance to watch a show once a month, if I'm lucky.
Does Hulu not remove old episodes of the current season anymore? Not to sound unreasonable, but just like how they allow some shows to have ads if they allow some shows to have episodes pulled before the season is over than its not reliable enough.
The purpose of these services it reduce the work of watching TV, and Hulu has had a history of being more difficult than Netflix.
It depends on the shows, some have the whole current season listed.
Both have pros and cons, although I think that Netflix beats out Hulu for the stuff that matters to me. I pay for the premium Netflix account, and the premium Hulu account, so I have both. If I was to cancel one sub today, it would be Hulu, but Hulu is not bad at all.
I think when Hulu lost CW shows, that kind of hurt them a bit. You can watch the 5 current CW shows for free +ads on the ATV4 CW app, but it would have been nice to keep them on Hulu too. The CW app has a lot of ads.
When it comes to original content, I think Netflix is the clear winner, although, I have never watched any Hulu original content, so many I am not being fair. There just has not been anything that I have found interesting enough to watch for Hulu's originals.
Oh it is. Many of the comments on this article pertain to disney titles but I was simply pointing out there is more than princesses and cartoons in this deal.
ESPN is a tricky service. The public has been asking for it al la cart for years, but we never got it. When I cut the cord it was really hard for me to give up ESPN, but in retrospect I haven't felt like I missed much value not having it. I'm sure their original programming is fine, but I don't give it much thought. Sports Center was a great way to end my day, but all that content can replaced with the internet. That leaves us with live sports. Monday Night Football has been a joke the last few years. The major US sports (NFL, NBA, NHL, and MLB) can for the most part be received over the air, if it's a local team, or via a subscription service. All four have a streaming service of some sort, and with the annoyance that is blackouts, you can see most games you want for less than a monthly cable subscription. For US minor sports having ESPN isn't never seemed reliable to me. Whenever I wanted to watch European soccer I could never find the match I wanted, and when I could time zones made me have to shift it anyway. I never feel the same about recorded sports. I just can't get into it. Same situation with motocross.
IF ESPN could resign their deals to allow live streaming...
IF ESPN could get those games to users reliably...
IF ESPN could keep prices reasonable...
I might consider it.
As it is, I'd rather pick the sports I care about and pay just for the season. Honestly, I would rather subscribe to just the teams I want to see from each sport. Considering most leagues charge @ $20 to $30 a month for all games, I'd pay $5 a month to only get my teams content streamed to my house. (EDIT: the wife and I have some different teams we care about, and I would even be willing to pay $5 for each team.) I'd even pay another $5 a month for all of the playoff games. As long as there are no blackouts.
What does ESPN offer than would make their presence matter today?
Even with cable and netflix/hulu I only end up using the cable once every few months (other people actively use it though)
The part of our cable subscription we actually use the most is the DVR to be honest. I think we'll be fine. We rarely watch a show live unless it's a sports game which I'm still researching on the best way to do that.
Is there no other way to watch college ball? I don't watch it because I can't follow the seemingly bizarre rules and playoffs. I might try and watch some of my college's games, if I had access to better commentary, but I'm not sure if I would pay for it. I can get free tickets to my current school if I really wanted to go to a game, otherwise they are broadcast OTA.
I have a lot of friends that are die hard for their Alma Mater, so I get that the sentiment exists. What would you do to see the games if you lost SEC?
Last edited:
Sounds like a win-win. Don't think of it as $6 for a soft pretzel. Think of it as $0.50 a screen.