Apple's Future
Is Apple delusional, or am I?
While the iMac is "cool," I fear it will take a bit more than "cool" to improve on that 5% market share (a percentage that reminds me of Apple's claim to 5 hour battery life on my iBook/500 - I've never seen more than 3 hours, which is "ccol," but it's certainly not 5).
To increase market share, it's going to take newbies, nonMac users, converts. But what nonMac user is gonna pay $1,000 more for a slower machine? And don't start spouting about Rubinstein's "Megahertz Myth," a concept only true Macheads are up on. You don't hear or see this conveyed to "potential" Mac users in ANY advertisements. None. And I don't count the less-than-easy-to-find link on Apple's site as advertisement.
Like it or not, all Joe Computer user (aka: email reader, internet surfer, game player) is interested in is Mhz. Period.
David Nagel at creativemac.com has an interesting read about this:
http://www.creativemac.com/2002/01_jan/editorials/macworldanalysiscm.htm
Simply put, in order to gain % in market share, it would seem that Apple MUST quickly (key) begin competing with the 2.2G boys of the industry. And imagine, if our processors were up to par with everyone else, and the only difference between us and them was OSes and pruduct design?!? well, I bet that % would rise just a wee bit...
Sorry for the nontopic-specific rant. Just frustrated.
lazyrighteye