And sometimes they even achieve more than they thought they would by crushing things.But who am I to challenge Apple's marketing division reasoning. They know their demographics and what they want to achieve with which ad.
And sometimes they even achieve more than they thought they would by crushing things.But who am I to challenge Apple's marketing division reasoning. They know their demographics and what they want to achieve with which ad.
Actualy you can say it this way... "the typical cheap $400 laptops can't do that". "But this thing costs over $1,000, so it can."
It doesn't matter much who built it. What's different about Apple is that they ignore the low-end segment of the market.
I must be getting old. Both of these ads seem slimy and not really funny. IMO, they need a new ad agency.
What's different about Apple is that they ignore the low-end segment of the market.
They are not ignoring it. They have chosen not prioritise it. Which is fine.Actualy you can say it this way... "the typical cheap $400 laptops can't do that". "But this thing costs over $1,000, so it can."
It doesn't matter much who built it. What's different about Apple is that they ignore the low-end segment of the market.
At least nothing got crushed!I must be getting old. Both of these ads seem slimy and not really funny. IMO, they need a new ad agency.
The condescending attitudes of the instigators got crushed. "It's a Mac, not a Windows piece of 💩"At least nothing got crushed!
Mine does.But do they switch to an external 4k monitor without issue? Because that is what I’m waiting for. My son’s M1 MBP has issues sometimes turning on from sleep when on external power and switching to the external monitor it is almost always connected to.
God, the PlayStation 3 font was awe full wasn’t it?lol that was quick and fun, I like it.
Not sure why, but reminds me of the creepy PS3 commercials with the baby ()