yes - you probably need some *long* cables with this product to make use of itLol those demo photos always crack me up. Everything aligned with perfect cable length and placement.
yes - you probably need some *long* cables with this product to make use of itLol those demo photos always crack me up. Everything aligned with perfect cable length and placement.
that’s why I like my 165 Watt Charger - if you really need that much power: go for it!One computer (96 watt ?)
One iPhone (5-20watt)
Another iPhone (5-20 watt)
iPad (18 watt)
What’s that… oh… 154…..
Okay maybe throw another MacBook in there. Haha 😂
All other battery packs detect this voltage and make you press a button to start charging. They could easily fix this by have it auto shutoff if only outputting .25 watts or less.
Um no. Literally EVERY battery pack does this. I have owned a dozen. Plugging a cable into them does NOT turn them on, only pushing the button does.That would not be USB-C PD compliant and would cause issues with low wattage devices like headsets.
I don't like Hyper but faulting them for following a standard is not fair.
Um no. Literally EVERY battery pack does this. I have owned a dozen. Plugging a cable into them does NOT turn them on, only pushing the button does.
There is nothing about a standard here. And dumping 0.20 watts into a cable that isn’t plugged into anything is just straight up stupid.
No one cares what the USB C spec says. You can implement a minimum current however you want. USB C spec is a giant mess anyways.Worth a read:
![]()
Why Does the Battery on the PowerPack 20K Drain Even When My Apple Device Is Not Connected?
Q: When using a USB-C to Lightning cable, the four LED lights on the PowerPack 20K keep flashing even with no device connected to the other end of the cable. The battery is draining while this happens. Is this an issue? A: The PowerPack 20K is behaving this way because of the constraints of the...www.zmi.com
Just because almost everyone is doing it doesn't make it right.
man... thats too bad 😔 I guess, at least someone is doing it, hopefully more to followJust so you know, this is a possibility. I took a while to find this. If you want to see how bad this company is, check:
![]()
HyperJuice 245W USB-C Battery Pack & GaN Charger
World's Most Powerful 245W GaN Charger & 245W USB-C Battery Pack (27000mAh/100Wh). 4 x USB-C Ports. | Check out 'HyperJuice 245W USB-C Battery Pack & GaN Charger' on Indiegogo.www.indiegogo.com
No one cares what the USB C spec says. You can implement a minimum current however you want. USB C spec is a giant mess anyways.
The fact you think it’s acceptable to dump energy as heat through a cable and to drain a battery over a few days is beyond me.
It doesn’t matter what the spec says. The fact that most do it shows that the utility is better than the alternative.
This battery is useless to me.
I don’t know any devices that charge at less than a fifth a watt. Do you?Bluetooth headsets and other small devices often pull a very small current. If a power bank does not follow USB-C spec these devices will not be able to charge as the power bank will assume nothing is connected and turn off.
Agree I don't care about L vs C, but anything that can only be inserted one way needs to go already.Fina-effing-ally (pardon my language). All the powerbanks that 9to5 and macrumors have been posting about recently were like 2 usb c plus an A or 3 usb c plus an A. But everyone keeps complaining about apple not moving on from lightning. I'd argue the usb a port being kept around so long is the real sin. Very happy about an powerbank with multiple usb c ports and no A coming out. Very very happy! Anker's latest drop is literally terrible for the environment with all their usb a ports that most people with up to date gadgets don't freaking use anymore
They are likely too small to interest a law firm for a class action...and even if they weren't, I doubt the damages would be collectible. If they've gone silent, that isn't a good sign.FWIW, there are lots of people complaining on HyperShop's public Zendesk community that support has gone completely non-responsive. I can confirm the same, as I've tried to reach out multiple ways now since my 245w battery pack is defective. Attempting to call them results in a perpetual busy signal, and they do not respond to private Zendesk tickets. This is fairly recent, seemingly in the last 1-2 months. Here's one example.
What's wild is that they actually wiped the product page for the 245w battery pack completely from their site. It can't be found anywhere. Yet their online shop is still up and selling their other products.
There has to be some sort of legal recourse for this, no?