.. just a 27" Glassy display, ala 27" iMac screen on a stand.
I hope will give us a matte option. But being used to a 30", going smaller to a 27" sucks
There's hope for an updated 30" matte ACD but I won't be holding my breath
.. just a 27" Glassy display, ala 27" iMac screen on a stand.
I hope will give us a matte option. But being used to a 30", going smaller to a 27" sucks
There's hope for an updated 30" matte ACD but I won't be holding my breath
I wish Apple would update the 30" ACD too. The 27" iMac display is not only smaller it has a higher dot pitch which makes text and menus harder to read. And I doubt Apple will make matte an option on a 27" ACD![]()
If you don't like glossy displays, there are several alternatives to buying an Apple-branded monitor. Besides, ACDs are essentially IPS panels wrapped in pretty boxes.
The alternatives are either crappy Dell monitors or expensive EIZO's Maybe the NEC's might fit somewhere in the middle![]()
The alternatives are either crappy Dell monitors or expensive EIZO's Maybe the NEC's might fit somewhere in the middle![]()
never quite understood why people payed that much money for an Apple monitor. obviously they quality is "far" from what you expect for such pricey monitors. Also in an agency where i worked they had 3 of those 30" monitors give up on them in 2 years time! experienced it myself, while working on some project, thousands of pixels turned greenish/blue all over the screen...i told the boss and he was like "F$#k, another one!" then he explained this was the third 30" Apple that gave up in 2 years time (and no, it wasn't the video card)
since recently he had the broken ones replaced with 30" Dell ultra sharps and Apple doesn't even come close to the Dells quality
I'm very sorry. My sincerest apologies. I meant to say Dell monitors LOOK like CRAP![]()
I'd be surprised if Apple replaced the 30" ACD with a 27" one. The loss in screen size and resolution would not be seen as worth it to a lot of professionals - particularly those that have been using 30" ACDs for six years now. My guess is that Apple is holding off until it can produce a 30"+ display. Possibly 32" with a resolution superior to that of the 30" ACD. Possibly 2844x1600 or even 3072x1728. 2560x1600 was a limitation of the DVI spec. Display port can go a fair bit higher - up to 3840x2160x30bpp@60Hz. With matte as an option.
apple updates their ACD's once in a blue moon, so its not surprising that we're not seeing any sort of updates.
I picked up a 24" ACD last March and was chastised because the 27" was around the corner
I think it all comes down to the sweetest of the transition metals...I'm talking about Mercury of course. I don't see Apple introducing a new Mercury containing product, which means its would need to be LED. AFAIK, there is not a current maker of an LED back panel the size needed for the direct replacement of the 30 inch ACD. The closes is the LED backlight used in the 27 inch iMac. Apple might special order one I guess, but I doubt it given their recent track record in the professional arena.
I don't think that's necessarily true - LED backlit LCD TVs have been on the market for a good while now in sizes far over 27". The tricky part would be the manufacture of panels with such a high resolution. Mind you, I don't remember hearing about panels capable of displaying as many pixels as the 30", 24" and even all the way back to the 22" ACDs. As far as I'm aware, they were all Apple firsts.
I would be very surprised if the 30" wasn't replaced when the new Mac Pros finally emerge, which should mean in the very near future after the 5xxx driver release. Mind you, I was convinced that the ACDs would be replaced when the 2008 and 2009 Mac Pros were both released!
Doesn't HP have the newer ZR24W or something along those lines that was meant to replace the 2475W?