It's amazing every new 'I' release we have similar threads to "wait for next generation"
iPhone 2007 and iPhone 2008 were the same exact freaking phones (terms of size, exact processor, exact RAM, exact camera) and people still went for the iPhone 3G cause Apple included 3G/GPS which had been around for 3-4 years in the USA by that time already and in Europe/Asia for 7-8 years.
Same with the iPad 1 vs iPad 2 debate (many had threads saying iPad 2 wasn't worth the upgrade even though it was a major design change and lighter and duo core/face time/crappy camera).
We had similar threads with iPad 2 vs. "new iPad" aka iPad 3 this past March. People were saying performance wise, ipad 2 and ipad 3 were the same. Some people didn't care about the screen. They said iPad 2 and iPad 3 supported the same exact cases and were the same body.
So OP, why did you get the iPad 3 to began with when you could have had iPad 2 for cheaper in March 2012 when Apple discounted all the remaining iPad 2 32/64GB model? Think about it. Performance is the same, the body was the same. So what about the 5MP camera, who really uses the 5MP camera anyways? And iPad 3 was heavier. So you basically got the iPad 3 cause it had a better screen but the trade off was it was heavier?
What you are saying to iPad 4 owners is they are paying for a chip that significantly improves performance. iPad 4 is very fast. It's the fastest ipad/iphone. That's what people are paying for is what you are saying?
So you paid more for the retina screen without improvement over performance in iPad 2?
Think about what you are saying.
Disclaimer, I've owned iPad 1,2,3, and now 4. I still have iPad 3 and iPad 4. I sold off my iPad 2 and got the iPad 4 wifi while also keeping the LTE iPad 3 (cause unlimited Verizon LTE data is amazing).
iPhone 2007 and iPhone 2008 were the same exact freaking phones (terms of size, exact processor, exact RAM, exact camera) and people still went for the iPhone 3G cause Apple included 3G/GPS which had been around for 3-4 years in the USA by that time already and in Europe/Asia for 7-8 years.
Same with the iPad 1 vs iPad 2 debate (many had threads saying iPad 2 wasn't worth the upgrade even though it was a major design change and lighter and duo core/face time/crappy camera).
We had similar threads with iPad 2 vs. "new iPad" aka iPad 3 this past March. People were saying performance wise, ipad 2 and ipad 3 were the same. Some people didn't care about the screen. They said iPad 2 and iPad 3 supported the same exact cases and were the same body.
So OP, why did you get the iPad 3 to began with when you could have had iPad 2 for cheaper in March 2012 when Apple discounted all the remaining iPad 2 32/64GB model? Think about it. Performance is the same, the body was the same. So what about the 5MP camera, who really uses the 5MP camera anyways? And iPad 3 was heavier. So you basically got the iPad 3 cause it had a better screen but the trade off was it was heavier?
What you are saying to iPad 4 owners is they are paying for a chip that significantly improves performance. iPad 4 is very fast. It's the fastest ipad/iphone. That's what people are paying for is what you are saying?
So you paid more for the retina screen without improvement over performance in iPad 2?
Think about what you are saying.
Disclaimer, I've owned iPad 1,2,3, and now 4. I still have iPad 3 and iPad 4. I sold off my iPad 2 and got the iPad 4 wifi while also keeping the LTE iPad 3 (cause unlimited Verizon LTE data is amazing).