ActiveX is the biggest security hole in historyyellow said:Is ActiveX what MS dubbed their version of Java?
ActiveX is the biggest security hole in historyyellow said:Is ActiveX what MS dubbed their version of Java?
edesignuk said:ActiveX is the biggest security hole in history![]()
coconn06 said:I realize that perhaps my "rant" was slightly unclear and could be misunderstood. So I'll clear that up: I was also defending Safari. I meant that the developers of non-standard websites, not the developers of Safari, practice poor design.
So we are in agreement about Safari and web developers using non-standard design and technology.
James L said:While Safari has always had excellent CSS and standards support (thanks Dave Hyatt), it did, until the latest version, have issues with some scripting situations and a few other areas. I know some people will defend it to death, but it is only a version 1 browser with some kinks to work out. It is, however, my favourite browser!
Now, with regards to your situation, here is what I did when I ran into it with a website that told me I had to use IE. I took several pages from the site, ran them through the W3 validator, and copied and pasted all the page errors into an email. I sent this email to the head of the company explaining that I was using a non IE browser, and that their site told me I couldn't use anything but IE to access it. I explained to him that the only time a site says this is when the developer does not know how to code properly, and that it was akin to telling customers we will only allow you to park in our lot if you drive a Ford.
I said that it was a shame that they spent good money to have an inferior developer design their site, and that he was losing customers because of it. If the page had no errors and was designed properly to web standards that it wouldn't matter what browser they were using, and that he wouldn't be losing customers by shutting them out simply because his web designer only knew how to code for 1 browser instead of the entire internet population.
It worked... I got a reply, and free stuff to boot!
Cheers,
James
James L said:While Safari has always had excellent CSS and standards support (thanks Dave Hyatt), it did, until the latest version, have issues with some scripting situations and a few other areas. I know some people will defend it to death, but it is only a version 1 browser with some kinks to work out. It is, however, my favourite browser!
Now, with regards to your situation, here is what I did when I ran into it with a website that told me I had to use IE. I took several pages from the site, ran them through the W3 validator, and copied and pasted all the page errors into an email. I sent this email to the head of the company explaining that I was using a non IE browser, and that their site told me I couldn't use anything but IE to access it. I explained to him that the only time a site says this is when the developer does not know how to code properly, and that it was akin to telling customers we will only allow you to park in our lot if you drive a Ford.
I said that it was a shame that they spent good money to have an inferior developer design their site, and that he was losing customers because of it. If the page had no errors and was designed properly to web standards that it wouldn't matter what browser they were using, and that he wouldn't be losing customers by shutting them out simply because his web designer only knew how to code for 1 browser instead of the entire internet population.
It worked... I got a reply, and free stuff to boot!
Cheers,
James
McMac said:I love Safari but ...
I seem to get the spining beach ball an awful lot, even on fairly simply pages. I clean out the cache now and then, but this is unacceptable to do often when you are on a slow dial-up connection (< 28k). It seemed to get a lot worse with the last Safari update.
I am even thinking of dumping Safari for another browser![]()
Nope - ActiveX and Java are completely unrelated. ActiveX has no equivalent on other platforms; The MS version of Java is C# (C sharp).yellow said:Is ActiveX what MS dubbed their version of Java?
wrldwzrd89 said:Nope - ActiveX and Java are completely unrelated. ActiveX has no equivalent on other platforms; The MS version of Java is C# (C sharp).