I really want an iMac, but is it the right time?

Discussion in 'iMac' started by PatriotInvasion, Feb 18, 2014.

  1. PatriotInvasion macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #1
    When the 13" rMBP was released in October 2012, I sold my mid-2010 27" iMac in exchange for the Retina screen and portability the rMBP provided. Since that time, I've added an iPad Air to the mix which is capable of handling my portable computing needs, so now I'm stuck with a small 13" screen to use at my desk. I want to go back to an iMac but worried now is not the right time for the following reasons. Interested in your thoughts on the 2 concerns holding me back.:eek:

    1.) A 4K/Retina iMac is likely just around the corner (and I'll want it) so buying a Haswell iMac today is setting myself up for disappointment sooner rather than later

    2.) After being in an all-Retina environment for the past year and a half, going back to a non-Retina iMac won't be worth the cost to get one despite the larger screen and added horsepower.

    What would you do?
     
  2. PicnicTutorials macrumors 6502a

    PicnicTutorials

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2013
    #2
    I had the same contemplation. If it was a matter of waiting a few months for those things I would easily have done it. But I think you will be waiting a couple of years. I don't know maybe. They already tricked out the form factor. Already tricked out the guts. Unless they remake the looks there is not much more to do but the retina. So maybe. But reading like threads others seem to think this is a couple years off.
     
  3. PatriotInvasion thread starter macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #3
    Well, with the influx of 4K displays on the market, I'd be surprised if Apple didn't join the party in the next 12 months. They are usually at the forefront of display resolution, so even if they had to start out at higher price points for 4K, I think they will do it. That said, even if they did come out with a 4K iMac in the $2,250-$2,500 range later this year or next, I probably couldn't stomach spending that much anyway, so that works in the favor of pulling the trigger now.
     
  4. shaunp macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    #4
    Buy a decent 27" monitor for now to use with your rMBP. When 4k is viable, an right now it's not for many people, then decide. In the mean time you will have the extra screen space when at home, and portability when you are not. If you get something that uses display port then you can connect this to your iMac if you decide to get one later and have two nice big screens.
     
  5. fig macrumors 6502a

    fig

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #5
    I can't find any reason to worry about 4k at this point, outside of the displays being available.
     
  6. PatriotInvasion thread starter macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #6
    For about the same price, I can sell the rMBP and get the 27" iMac, so would prefer to go that route. As mentioned, the iPad is sufficient for my needs when I need portability.

    How about the Retina issue. Has anyone gone from a Retina MacBook Pro to an iMac...or use a Thunderbolt Display with a rMBP and is ok with the lower pixel density in exchange for screen space?
     
  7. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #7
    I would buy an external display and hook the rMBP up to it. You can buy a pretty good IPS display for less than $200 these days.
     
  8. PatriotInvasion thread starter macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #8
    Not a 27" display at 2560x1440 resolution with a Thunderbolt dock, speakers, and an integrated webcam. That runs $800+. Also, I'm only considering Apple branded products for the sake of this discussion.:):apple: I have little interest in mismatching brands on the desk. Not into the creaky plastic alternatives.

    I can probably sell my 13" rMBP with 2 years remaining on AppleCare for $1,000-$1,100. Then it comes down to paying the net difference between a 21.5" vs 27". With a corporate discount and no sales tax in New Hampshire, I'd be looking at a net cost of $409 for a 21.5" or $879 for a 27"...both base models + a Fusion Drive.
     
  9. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #9
    1. Who actually uses the webcam enough to make it a deciding factor.

    2. The speakers in the iMac/Cinema Display are mediocre at best.

    3. Buying Apple means you have limited choices and a glossy display is mandatory...unfortunately.

    I can see where this is going so just come out and say it; you are interested in paying more for the Apple logo than getting value. Therefore, no answer is going to help you and this thread is moot. You have already talked yourself into buying the iMac even though you know you are going to regret it as soon as it gets the display update.

    By the way, Apple displays aren't any better than other good displays on the market. They all come from the same manufacturers.

    I have owned an iMac for the past 3 years, and while it served me well, I got sick of the limited upgrade options, limited variance in choice from Apple, and being tied to my desk.
     
  10. jakesaunders27 macrumors 6502a

    jakesaunders27

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #10
    If you want an iMac I would say go for it now as with the haswell refresh its a beast of a machine, I would defiantly go for it 4K isn't huge at the moment anyway and surely you could just buy a 4K TBD to go with the iMac in the future anyway. Sell your MBP and go for it I say!
     
  11. Intelligent macrumors 6502a

    Intelligent

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    #11
    Get a retina 27" screen?
     
  12. jakesaunders27 macrumors 6502a

    jakesaunders27

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2012
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #12
    Also meant to say, you could wait for the Mac Mini refresh and buy a TBD and a MM and then sell the TBD when the 4k one comes along?
     
  13. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #13
    Where? Is there some special Apple store that has products that haven't been released to market yet?
     
  14. tom vilsack macrumors 68000

    tom vilsack

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    Location:
    ladner cdn
    #14
    I agree...been looking at a asus mx239h (200 amazon) not sure if the best,but oh so nice looking.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #15
    There are a lot of 23" monitors on the market that look similar. Take a look at the AOC i2367fh. You can buy that display for $149 from Amazon, it has a beautiful AH-IPS display, had different stand options (regular stand or picture frame without the stand), and looks very nice.

    You can find the i2367f for even less right now at best buy. This model doesn't have HDMI inputs.

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B009V8F700


    Check out the following link. You can see how beautiful the display looks. Although, it looks even better in person.

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwc_sYgRf-8
     
  16. IA64 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    #16
    IMO iMac will never get a 4K display screen, not at least before 2 years or so.

    The mobile Graphic card is too weak to drive anything at 1440p.

    Even with the GTX780/880/980, there isn't really enough juice to run apps at native resolution @ 60FPS with 4K displays.

    Best bet would be Apple releasing 4K external monitors using TB2.

    Other than that, you're wasting your hopes.

    Cheers.
     
  17. fig macrumors 6502a

    fig

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #17
    I own one, it looks great but unfortunately the stand is kinda wobbly. The display itself isn't going to fall over or anything, but any bump of the desk puts the monitor bouncing.
     
  18. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #18
    It's sturdier without the stand.
     
  19. Altemose macrumors G3

    Altemose

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Location:
    Elkton, Maryland
    #19
    I do not own an iMac but I can tell you from experience at browsing at the Apple Store that the Retina display is beautiful. However, the iMac has a gorgeous screen, especially on the 27" model.
     
  20. Solomani macrumors 68030

    Solomani

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Location:
    Alberto, Canado
    #20
    For the past 2 years, the trend is for iMacs to be released at the END of the year, just barely in time for the Christmas season. It's only February right now. If you can wait until November/December, then that would be the best option.

    And if you can't wait… then obviously you're going to get whatever is available now.
     
  21. PatriotInvasion thread starter macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #21
    You do realize this is MacRumors.com and my post was specifically about purchasing or not purchasing an Apple iMac.

    Don't want to stare at an ASUS or Dell logo when using OS X. Just not for me, regardless of price.
     
  22. PatriotInvasion thread starter macrumors 65816

    PatriotInvasion

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #22
    BTW - Went into an Apple Store today. I don't think the 21.5" is worth the hassle of selling the rMBP and eating more money. It's nice, but not awe inspiring like that 27".

    Even coming from the Retina screen of the MBP, 2560x1440 is plenty crisp enough and provides screen real estate galore.:D:apple:

    Ughhh...now I just have to figure out how to explain the expense to my wife. We'll see.
     
  23. accountforit macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    #23
    The 21.5 and 27 have almost identical PPI (102 vs 109). I am not sure why the 27 would be any more "crisp" than the 21.5. Your mind is lying to your eyes. Apple loves it but your wallet hates it.
     
  24. Shift Option K macrumors regular

    Shift Option K

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    #24
    The 4K iMac would probably be 31/5" or 32" which is the size of most small TV's, and then the new Macintosh TV is born.
     
  25. fig macrumors 6502a

    fig

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #25
    So just off the stand it stays up by itself? Never tried, but that would unfortunately put it several inches too low to be comfortable.

    Might be worth trying though, the display itself looks great. Really wish it was a VESA mount.
     

Share This Page