You need to actually USE both for a week, then you'll change your tune I'm sure.
I have? They have the same height so aside from weight and footprint, they feel somewhat identical when carrying; similar to how a 4.3 inch phoen that fills thin doesn't feel as "big" as a 4.0 inch phone that's a lot thicker.
But I mean, I put the thing in a backpack when I'm not carrying it downstairs, I don't see how far I have to walk with the thing in my hands; if it isn't in a bag, it's on a desk or something.
I've used my mother's 15.6 inch toshiba the same way, and that's a lot thicker/heavier; it isn't "that" much more of a burden. Either people are greatly exaggerating or I have no sense of weight and/or depth. It's all personal preference but seriously; they aren't ginormous.
All of the notebooks are pretty thin. Yes some are larger. We all know this. Looking at the tech page shows this. However, I think "some" people put a bit too much emphasis on the size.
I am going to get flamed for this. But I still don't understand why one would get a MBA of any kind (especially the 11 inch).
I am trying to think of a situation where one would use a MBA over a MBP15 or even the MBP13. Now I myself made the mistake of getting the MBP13 myself. Though it wasn't really a mistake cause I was expecting a redesign next year but I needed a laptop now so I went for the cheapest offering with the intention of selling it next year for a redesigned fully loaded MBP15.
One reason to get the MBA11/13 is portability. But why wouldn't you just get an ipad AND a MBP15. You wouldn't bring the the MBA13 with you every time anyway unlike the ipad and you can't just flash it in public as easily as an ipad so its function is limited to doing pure computer related stuff. Plus for the occasions that you do bring it with you, how much of a hassle for that rare occasion is it to bring the MBP15 with you. For home situation its really a no brainer too. Moving the MBP15 from your desk to the toilet to the bed is just as easy as moving the MBA11/13.
Why wouldnt you want a lighter, thinner laptop. There are a few advantages for a Macbook Pro over a MBA but there are disadvantages also. The SSD is SO much faster too.
you forgot the most important thing , MBP looks like a brick in comparison to a MBA , and today its all about looks , slim slimmer slimmest ,
I'm not saying it's a bad product, I like it, but for the price you're paying and the limitations it gives (no RAM upgrade, performance is on par with C2D), I just don't see the point when you can get an upgradable machine that is more powerful for less. AND it has a better screen.
Performance is anything but "on par with the Core 2 Duo." The last time I checked, the 1.8GHz i7 puts out numbers that are very close to the 2.3GHz i5, and easily twice as fast as the 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo model. Sure, it has some downsides, but don't make up shortcomings of the MacBook Air that aren't there.
As for the SSD, the one in the Air is about the same as the one Apple offers in the Pro. True, you can get a faster drive with a Sandforce controller, but they tend to be less reliable. Plus, the MacBook Air has a SATA III port on the logic board, so eventually you can replace the SSD if you want when there is a meaningful difference in SSD speeds (and not just the incremental difference of Toshiba/Samsung to SandForce). Plus, it is still an added cost. $1199 for the Pro, plus $200 for a third party 128GB SSD, and you are now $50 more than the cost of an 11" i7, or $100 more than the base 13". True, you get the FireWire 800 port, an optical drive, and expandable RAM, but for those of us who don't need those, it means more money.
1) Along with that ULV graphics card, I would argue yes, that performance is pretty much the same. In terms of rendering, playing games, and other cpu intensive tasks, it's faster, yes, but only by so much.
But that's only half of my argument.
2) I already did the math in my previous post:
Because I can simply BUY a BETTER SSD for 200, put that in the MBP and either have 2 drives or one drive that's better than what comes in the MBA stock. ALL for only 100 dollars more.
But thanks for reiterating my point.
But just to clarify, we all have our respective reasons for owning either the MBP or MBA, nobody is arguing against that. Nor is anybody (I don't think) arguing one is "better" than the other.
There is no "better", only different.
I also considered that route, the resolution even if it's better color wise turned me off the MBP. also this isn't meant to be a desktop replacement for me, more like a mobile office from when i'm out so 4GB is plenty enough.
1) Along with that ULV graphics card, I would argue yes, that performance is pretty much the same. In terms of rendering, playing games, and other cpu intensive tasks, it's faster, yes, but only by so much.
But that's only half of my argument.
2) I already did the math in my previous post:
Because I can simply BUY a BETTER SSD for 200, put that in the MBP and either have 2 drives or one drive that's better than what comes in the MBA stock. ALL for only 100 dollars more.
But thanks for reiterating my point.
But just to clarify, we all have our respective reasons for owning either the MBP or MBA, nobody is arguing against that. Nor is anybody (I don't think) arguing one is "better" than the other.
There is no "better", only different.
If you dont see the appeal of a thinner, lighter notebook than you just wont get it. Its much thinner and its much lighter. Its a very noticeable difference and a lot of people move their laptops around constantly.
ABecause I can simply BUY a BETTER SSD for 200, put that in the MBP and either have 2 drives or one drive that's better than what comes in the MBA stock. ALL for only 100 dollars more.
I don't want to compromise in performance for design when the MBP is already thin. It's ~1 inch thick. 5 pounds; I mean yea, the MBA is small, but how much thinner/lighter does it have to go? People put so much emphasis on the design when, ultimately, when it's on a table, all that weight reduction simply does not matter. Yes it's lighter, but (and remember, it's all subjective), 5 pounds is pretty light, for me, and I only weigh 135.
Also, 4 gigs of RAM just isn't enough for me, and I know it won't be 1,2,3 years down the line either.
I'm not saying it's a bad product, I like it, but for the price you're paying and the limitations it gives (no RAM upgrade, performance is on par with C2D), I just don't see the point when you can get an upgradable machine that is more powerful for less. AND it has a better screen.
That's comparing the baseline 13 inch of the MBP and MBA of course.
Size isn't everything, and I really wanted it, I really did, but I sat back and thought rationally; I want this to last me for years and I know, with my usage, the MBA would reach it's limit within a year, if that; I'd already not like it as I run Bootcamp for games (space limitation) and I regularly max out the 4 gigs stock in my MBP.
----------
I mean, this is what people are posting. It's his opinion and I cannot say it's right, wrong, bad, or good, but I actually "do" work on my computer, and I simply need the performance to back me up when I'm dropping over a grand on it.
If it was all about performance, i would have simply gotten a m11x from Alienware for LESS than the MBP, with better specs. I love the size and form factor of thinness as much as the next guy, but there's a point where I just don't think it needs to be compromised 'that" much.
come on guys be honest you buy a MBA for the looks and only for the looks and not because of pragmatic reasons
what is that talk about weight all the time , ok i know most MBP users are now all in hospital with back injuries because its so much heavier then a MBA
come on guys be honest you buy a MBA for the looks and only for the looks and not because of pragmatic reasons , you still need a backpack to carry it and we are only talking about 13" as they are comparable
MBA
Height: 0.3-1.7 cm (0.11-0.68 inches)
Width: 32.5 cm (12.8 inches)
Depth: 22.7 cm (8.94 inches)
Weight: 1.35 kg (2.96 pounds)2
MBP
Height: 2.41 cm (0.95 inches)
Width: 36.4 cm (14.35 inches)
Depth: 24.9 cm (9.82 inches)
Weight: 2.54 kg (5.6 pounds)
ok and you guys want to tell me seriously you are unable to lift a extra 1.19kg (2.64 pounds )
it seems a bit more exercise could not harm
I agree. In addition to my 2010 MBA I have a 17 inch Santa Rosa MBP and an early iPad. I still use the MBP for ripping CDs to disc but not much else. I use the iPad primarily to read the Daily Oklahoman, which has a first class app for the iPad. Otherwise, though, I hardly use the iPad because its mail client is primitive and document preparation, even something as simple as email, is painfully slow. It sure looks neat, though.Ok, I have the 11-inch air, also have the 17-inch pro, iPad2 and have had several 13-inch macbooks.
Why I like air over MBP 13, 15, 17, iPad.
Best all around.
i dont get that
look at those children in kabul afghanistan ,just a example as there are millions of children who do the same around the globe ,they carry water every day sometimes for miles
Image
and you honestly complain about 2.64 pounds more , that proves how degenerated we are in the western developed world
^worst argument ever.