And that is why I don't need a foldable. I work from home and even when I wasn't, work had dual and triple display setups. I'm either at work or home. On the rare occasion, if I'm in between, then whatever it is can wait until I get one place or the other. My 11 Pro Max stands in the gap in these cases just fine.
On the long flight? On the train? In all those "in-between" places where you might want a screen bigger than an iPhone MAX?
A fold/roll (or a virtual phone in Vpro) delivers an iPhone-sized screen when that is good enough, an iPad-sized screen when one needs bigger, etc. That's the point of it.
I fly a LOT. As the plane sits on the tarmac, I see lots of passengers using phones while they can still connect to 5G. In flight, most of those screens are put away and out comes tablets or laptop screens. Why? Apparently many wants bigger screens than the Phone screen they also have with them. So an phone that can also expand into a bigger screen... OR an iPad that can fold down into a phone-sized package is a "2 birds with 1 stone" product. Buy ONE thing and get BOTH. Carry/pack ONE thing and have BOTH.
As someone who opts to use iPad Mini cellular to also cover telephone text/phone needs (VOIP app with buds), I could somewhat say I already have a permanently-unfolded, iPhone fold. I only paid for ONE thing and only carry ONE thing to have BOTH (functionality-wise) now.
The biggest thing iPhone offers that it doesn't IMO is pocket-ability. I wish it could fold/roll down to a pocketable size vs. buying and carrying around TWO things or just living with a screen too small for some uses and too big for when I want to pocket it. That makes
this Apple customer interested in a foldable/rollable/other iDevice... or even virtualized iPhone + iPad + Mac in a Vpro if that becomes a possibility Apple will allow: Buy ONE thing and get all THREE+???
Before iPhone, Apple people carried a cell phone
and an iPod. With the launch of iPhone, Apple "folded" iPod functionality into it. Soon people opted to no longer buy and carry TWO separate things when one could do BOTH jobs well. Eventually, iPod was phased out completely because the utility of TWO distinct devices in ONE case made the iPod obsolete for just about everyone. Ahead of iPhone, we Apple people could not imagine iPod "going away." Now few of us can summon any justification at all for an iPod.
Before smart phones, some people interested in photography tended to carry both a phone and a camera. Smart phones brought pretty good cameras, cutting into that duality. They've steadily improved since then and much fewer people opt to also carry around a dedicated camera too. Same with camcorders.
We obviously LIKE it when we can effectively get two distinct things into one package. We simply have a hard time imagining it is something we want... until- apparently- Apple takes the stage to show us their cut of the merged/combined thing. Then it becomes "shut up and take my money" and "how did we ever get by without..."
There was a very long time we collectively detested phablet-sized phones... right up until Apple went there. Now we ridicule what used to be called "
perfect" 3.5" and 4" screen phones... and nobody seems to be in pants with bigger pockets or carrying man purses... nor have our hands suddenly grown a few inches for the all-important "one-handed use" slung like crazy in faulting the "abomination" phones bigger than Apple offered at the time.
In short: All detested/"99% don't want"/"what's the use case?" stuff seems to flip into "shut up and take my money" as soon as Apple offers their version of it. I expect this to be no different.